UFO appears on Argentina news channel, REAL or FAKE?

a reply to: paraphi

I`ve captured it myself from the original video. It is blurry but so is the building. As to why the bulding appears sharper it can also be explained by the colors being stronger on the building or the object was further away than it appears...



Yeah that white line bothers me as well...but look at other buildings, same separation between building and sky around it...

look at this sample...I think Gspat is right on this one.

originally posted by: paraphi
This is just another out-of-focus CGI, in my view. Added after the broadcast. Note that the UFO is out of focus while the buildings are not.

I disagree there, everything in the background is out of focus to some degree or another since the studio camera focus is on the news team, and that only adds even more to the poor quality of the background pictures as we see them on the internet.

a reply to: UnderKingsPeak
No. I'm talking historically. They always turn out to be faked. Sad but true.

a reply to: smurfy

I can definitely see a resemblance between the blur and a helicopter, with the lighter (white?) area being the rotors.

It's a little too big to simply be a blurdy... Or do they grow 'em that big in Argentina?

My feeling is that there is something there that crossed through the field of view of the camera, but what it is exactly is something I can't comment on with any degree of certainty.

originally posted by: gspat
a reply to: smurfy

I can definitely see a resemblance between the blur and a helicopter, with the lighter (white?) area being the rotors.

It's a little too big to simply be a blurdy... Or do they grow 'em that big in Argentina?

My feeling is that there is something there that crossed through the field of view of the camera, but what it is exactly is something I can't comment on with any degree of certainty.

Right on, there is enough points of reference in the background to know it is not something minute, and also enough there to know that the background is no more than a pastel behind the central figures. The white I considered as rotors too, or even overhead wings like a whisper jet, but I went for a helicopter since the path is more or less straight across, not something climbing or descending. So yes, there is nothing definitive one way or another, not much either to know about the studio as yet, they may or may not have robotic cameras, or cameramen on the floor.
Definitely not a Blurdy!

The thing that makes me think it's not a helicopter is...
Before it gets to the building it's pitched forward and as it emerges it starts to pitch backwards.
If a helicopter, the reverse pitch would show it slowing which it doesn't do as the speed is constant.

originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
a reply to: UnderKingsPeak
No. I'm talking historically. They always turn out to be faked. Sad but true.

No that's not true. However, what IS true is that some clown always shows up in the first three or four posts of ANY and ALL threads with a UFO video and dismisses it as fake. Quite often the footage is inconclusive, but debunkers rake it into the *hoax* bin because it can't be "proven" genuine.

a reply to: Urantia1111

Yeah that's because they're all fake.

originally posted by: paraphi
This is just another out-of-focus CGI, in my view. Added after the broadcast. Note that the UFO is out of focus while the buildings are not.

However, the tell-tale overlay, as shown by the image where there is a clear separation of UFO and building. Fake....

Not so sure, normally I'd put that down to poor masking for CGI BUT what I think we are seeing is simply a poor quality TV picture with overly compensated edges because of rubbish quality internet camera's. I saw it myself but if you look at the image where its a contrast between dark and light you see see a bright hard edge..

I thought all these "live" TV programs shot on city backgrounds are actually shot on green/blue screens and the city view videos are digitally superimposed, composed, whatever you call it. Kinda how they do the weather reports, if you know what I mean. Otherwise it would be a hell to achieve decent lightning in the studio.

Its a reallly nice Video, i love how these days everyone can be an image expert just because they can download photoshop lol

a reply to: stiver

Here in the UK most of our regional news shows have a live view through a studio window just like this.

It has been pointed out the frames with the building from .38 to .41. But also take a look at .50 when it flys behind the tower, there is a point of sticking down from the tower its in front of, yet behind the main tower. I say hoax.

a reply to: oubliette

I think those distortions are due to the thickness of the studio glass.

a reply to: paraphi

However, the tell-tale overlay, as shown by the image where there is a clear separation of UFO and building. Fake....

You are seeing what you want to see.

In my opinion it's not a "clear" separation as you claim. My mind isn't made up yet but and I keep an open mind for any possibility, including hoax, but you are jumping to conclusions it seems and over-exaggerating your points.

You have not proven this to be fake, that being said, I have not proven it to be real.

a reply to: real_one

Well we can say it's real because it was a live broadcast.
What the object is is the problem.

a reply to: UKWO1Phot

How can the thickness of the studio glass be causing that when everything is happening outside the glass, especially when its most likely not even a window, its probably a cam set up somewhere in the city and projected onto screens behind them. news channels do that all the time. you can clearly see the object at .50 flying both in front of something on the back of the tower, and behind the tower.

a reply to: oubliette

I can't see what you're seeing. I've been watching it in HD for the last day and it clearing goes behind everything in view.
Does the thing your seeing happen to the cars between the reporters?

a reply to: UKWO1Phot

I am at work right now, tonight I will see if I can isolate the clip where I am seeing it and post some pics.

I don't know, maybe I'm wrong here but I think we are all over thinking this. Aren't most of those news station backdrops either fake or green screens?? Which would mean this is completely fake?