It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
In every teaching that refers to marriage, both refer only to man and women. In teaching that refers to sexual sin and perversion, homosexual sex features fairly regularly.
It is therefore, safe to conclude that marriage is for a man and woman and the reason for that is because they were made for each other - man and woman. This is pretty evident throughout nature when it comes to creatures that reproduce sexually.
originally posted by: American-philosopher
My working definition of marriage is a committed bond between a man and a woman that says were going forward with the intention of being a family.
originally posted by: American-philosopher
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I see it as marriage as a title. Like I said I want same sex couples to have all the same rights and benefits and all that jazz.
now are you prepared to have a discussion about a title??
then if so were talking about something that fits the parameters for said title.
I can't title myself as a "girl scout" can I?
originally posted by: ketsuko
So if I'd vote against murder and rape, am I prejudiced against them too?
originally posted by: greencmp
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: greencmp
I'd say you are comparing apples to oranges here. You are a person and a union is a labor organization. It falls under different rules and guidelines by the nature of it not being human.
So, AARP should be able to commit acts of violence against opponents of the social security administration?
originally posted by: ketsuko
In every teaching that refers to marriage, both refer only to man and women. In teaching that refers to sexual sin and perversion, homosexual sex features fairly regularly.
This is pretty evident throughout nature when it comes to creatures that reproduce sexually.
But the fact is that homosexuality is natural. It’s widespread in nature and has been observed in 500 animal species, including all the great apes, of which humans are a part.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: ketsuko
Regardless of the government's original intentions as far as marriage goes this is where we stand now. To be honest, it was Christians themselves who got marriage intertwined with government. Funnily enough it is Christians who are the ones trying to change it when they don't like where government is going with it.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Then I guess everyone is a bigot in some form.
Especially people who call people bigots.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: ketsuko
Regardless of the government's original intentions as far as marriage goes this is where we stand now. To be honest, it was Christians themselves who got marriage intertwined with government. Funnily enough it is Christians who are the ones trying to change it when they don't like where government is going with it.
Explain to me again how we are not a Christian nation.
If we are going to blame Christians for this, then we can't refuse to say we have a Christian nation.