It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
a reply to: Profusion
Alarmist nonsense.
Alarmist nonsense.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
Alarmist nonsense.
It's a dead giveaway when the source cited is a YouTube video about a news article rather then the news article itself.
originally posted by: ketsuko
Of course not, NO ONE has seen it because they refuse to release the regulations so anyone can see them.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: stosh64
Of course not, NO ONE has seen it because they refuse to release the regulations so anyone can see them.
I'm sure they're all wonderful and great and everything everyone here has it in their head they are ... just like Barack Obama rides a unicorn that farts rainbows and brings fabulous success to everything he and his administration touch.
Alarmist nonsense
Of course not, NO ONE has seen it because they refuse to release the regulations so anyone can see them.
originally posted by: theMediator
originally posted by: ketsuko
Of course not, NO ONE has seen it because they refuse to release the regulations so anyone can see them.
It's absurd, how can regulations can be put in place if the people don't know what's being regulated?
Of course conspiracy minded people will find this way too fishy for it to be something that's only positive considering free speech.
Because the text of the rules has not yet been made public, it’s difficult to judge how well they might hold up. The prime questions will be whether or not the agency can sufficiently justify reversing the last decade of its treatment of the Web and whether it took the appropriate administrative steps to get here.