It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
If he worked for someone else who chose to make wedding cakes for whomever, and he takes the job ... then it's the same thing. You knew what you were getting into. It you can't make the cakes the employer requires you to make, then you should have been up front about it from the start.
originally posted by: PorteurDeMort
If anyone else tried that they'd be replaced.
originally posted by: ketsuko
Oh well, then no one with religious beliefs ought to own or operate a business?
When someone who tries to run their business according to their conscience does get into business and try to run their business according to their conscience and guiding principles, you don't like it
... because it means they might have "icky morals" that you don't agree with.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
I sympathize with her, because of how I was raised, and the fact that I understand how it feels to hold deeply religious views myself. ...
that seems like a very unusual interview, where the applicant states the role he wants, usually interviews are for a specific advertised role...
how do you know he decided he was too precious - where you there? have you seen a transcript?
it seems your response has tried to present opinion/conjecture as fact and is as misleading as the OPs title
originally posted by: rabbitpinch
a reply to: infolurker
the heading of this post is misleading - it claims the worker was given what he asked for - yet the story states he asked for a job in electrical and was refused - ergo he was not given what he asked for.
originally posted by: chuck258
originally posted by: rabbitpinch
a reply to: infolurker
the heading of this post is misleading - it claims the worker was given what he asked for - yet the story states he asked for a job in electrical and was refused - ergo he was not given what he asked for.
He did get what he asked for: A transfer from Cashier position so he didn't have to handle pork.
originally posted by: TheJourney
originally posted by: chuck258
originally posted by: rabbitpinch
a reply to: infolurker
the heading of this post is misleading - it claims the worker was given what he asked for - yet the story states he asked for a job in electrical and was refused - ergo he was not given what he asked for.
He did get what he asked for: A transfer from Cashier position so he didn't have to handle pork.
He got partially what he asked for, not 'exactly' what he asked for.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
The titles of these kinds of threads really bother me.
Its just the way its a MUSLIM suing his employer is conveyed in the title and in the OP
This guy lets face it is a idiot who is pissed he never got the cool job in the electronics department so is using every excuse he can muster to get his own way and when that doesn't work he tries to sue.
He just also happens to be Muslim and even tried using that as a excuse.
I don't know, might just be me but I always find these threads that start with the line "Muslim/Jew/Christian....." says quite a lot about the intolerances that the individual posting may be harbouring.
It turns form a thread that should be about the lengths this guy will go to to make a life a misery for his employers to about him doing it because he is a Muslim and before we know it the debate is all about Muslims and not the unscrupulous lengths people will go to to get their own way.
Doesn't sit quite right with me.