It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
So Iran are equivalent to the Nazis???
Kindly, get real!
originally posted by: FalafelBallz
originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: boymonkey74
Good point....for now lets call it secret negotiations. I will edit accordingly. TY.
What secret negotiations with Iran? What are they negotiating? If they are secret how do you know about it?
Mr. Obama’s threat reportedly deterred Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu from dispatching warplanes into Iran after Israel discovered that the U.S. had entered into secret talks with tehran and that the two countries had signed an agreement, according to Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Jarida.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
So Iran are equivalent to the Nazis???
Kindly, get real!
You suggested that, I didn't.
great tangent deflection technique.
Neville Chamberlain did that and look what happened !!!
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Connector
Never be a sucker.
Just ask the 52 American hostages that were captive in Iran for 444 days.
Even Carter called it a terrorist act.
The crisis was described by the western media as an entanglement of "vengeance and mutual incomprehension."[3] In Iran, the hostage taking was widely seen as a blow against the United States and its influence in Iran, its perceived attempts to undermine the Iranian Revolution, and its longstanding support of the recently overthrown Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Following his overthrow in 1979, the Shah was admitted into the U.S. for medical treatment for cancer. The Iranians demanded that the Shah be returned to Iran for trial and execution for crimes he was accused of committing during his reign. Specifically, they accused the Shah of crimes against Iranian citizens with the help of his secret police, the SAVAK. Iranians saw the asylum granted by the U.S. as American complicity in the atrocities the Shah had committed. In the United States, the hostage-taking was seen as an egregious violation of the principles of international law which granted diplomats immunity from arrest and diplomatic compounds' inviolability.[4][5]
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Connector
Never be a sucker.
Just ask the 52 American hostages that were captive in Iran for 444 days.
Even Carter called it a terrorist act.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: IAMTAT
That is from the stand point that this is verified and actually happened...
And why does isreal get to attack a nation just out of the blue?
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Regardless as to whether you are PRO or CON Iran, Israel, U.S. or even Obama...
It is just simple logic:
IF Iran now knows that the U.S. has already stopped Israel from bombing Iranian nuclear facilities once...and is threatening to stop any future attacks on them...Iran can rest easy, knowing the U.S. will continue to keep their facilities safe from IAF bombing raids...as they continue to string Obama/ Kerry along in 'negotiations' until they have their nukes.