It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: infinityorder
National pride is really all we have left st this point.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
If you feel the need to post something negative because somebody said something positive about the USA... Your bashing the USA.
For those that point to the wars the us has been in as proof how horrible we are. How come you alway take such a small snap shot of history as proof.
We haven't even come close to the body counts of Russia, France, England, once you open that window fully.
Bottom line... While you point out the flaws in America I will wager those same flaws are reflected in your country.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
If you feel the need to post something negative because somebody said something positive about the USA... Your bashing the USA.
For those that point to the wars the us has been in as proof how horrible we are. How come you alway take such a small snap shot of history as proof.
We haven't even come close to the body counts of Russia, France, England, once you open that window fully.
Bottom line... While you point out the flaws in America I will wager those same flaws are reflected in your country.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: mister.old.school
I absolutely hate that term. There isn't a more pompous, arrogant, egocentric or just plain conceited term possible for anyone could use. The fact that it's also not true is an embarrassment. Neocons love using it too and it makes me sick when I hear it. It's like some people have never heard of the word humility or humbleness.
American Exceptionalism = Patriotic Masturbation
Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, in a speech discussing the Chief Committee for Political Education, told the assembled delegates that "It is with absolute frankness that we speak of this struggle of the proletariat; each man must choose between joining our side or the other side. Any attempt to avoid taking sides in this issue must end in fiasco.
George Orwell wrote in his 1942 essay "Pacifism and the War", "If you hamper the war effort of one side you automatically help that of the other. Nor is there any real way of remaining outside such a war as the present one. In practice, ‘he that is not with me is against me’. The idea that you can somehow remain aloof from and superior to the struggle, while living on food which British sailors have to risk their lives to bring you, is a bourgeois illusion bred of money and security."
Benito Mussolini declared in speeches across fascist Italy: "O con noi o contro di noi"—You're either with us or against us.[citation needed]
János Kádár, in an effort to unite Hungary after the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, announced in December 1961, "those who are not against us are with us."
Hillary Clinton said on September 13, 2001: "Every nation has to either be with us, or against us. Those who harbor terrorists, or who finance them, are going to pay a price."
President George W. Bush, in an address to a joint session of Congress on September 20, 2001 said, "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."
Vic Toews Canadian Public Safety Minister said on February 13, 2012: ".. either stand with us or with the child pornographers" in response to questions from Quebec MP Francis Scarpaleggia (Lac-Saint-Louis) regarding extensive Privacy Commission concerns about 'warrant-less access' to all Canadian Internet and Cell phone accounts under the proposed legislation contained in bill C-30 "Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act" introduced the following day (February 14, 2012) in the House of Commons of Canada.