Homeland Security Warns of Terrorist Threat from Right-Wingers

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask

originally posted by: CranialSponge
Ramping up the left-right finger pointing brawls in preparation for an internal false flag event that will justify creating addendums to the Patriot Act, new tyrannical laws put forth, and the further removal of liberty and justice for all ?

Just my two pence.

Like Net Neutrality.........

Hey guys remember the Right WIngers and the Patriot act? Dont make the same mistake with Net Neutrality

Maybe you should actually learn something about Net Neutrality before making such a comment.

Learn what?

It's all a secret!

If you know something we don't, please share!

a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Coming from someone who just implied the DHS are stockpiling ammunition to start a war with the American people?

I know who is in fantasy land... & I won't see them in the mirror.

Given their "new" stance on "right-wingers", what exactly would you expect if the American citizens began fighting each other? According to their own studies and declarations, they could simply state that they are intervening to protect "their" citizens from internal terrorist. Am I wrong?

I feel you try to oversimplify extremely complex situations. You are assuming the best or trying to be logical, but refuse to see the illogical acts as so.

a reply to: doompornjunkie

Why would American citizens begin fighting each other?

That's exactly the scenario they'd want.
It would justify their statements.

Don't fight each other, relax, and use your vote wisely.

I know you're a doomporn junkie, but there should be limits to your indulgence.
Too much of anything is bad for you...



& dwelling too much on a hypothetical massacre on the American people at the hands of the Government...
That's the time to step back imo.

Not to accuse people of being illogical.

a reply to: xuenchen

Has the DHS even seen the average person they're talking about? Health factors alone would create a logistical nightmare shadowing any sort of threat they may pose. I'm not afraid of threats I can outwalk.

Beyond that, I'm still with most of you on this. I may not agree with most "right-wingers" on very many things but singling out people with particular political leanings is never a good thing. Their ideology may result in atrocities in history or in foreign lands (I'm talking about the religious aspect in this case) but, in the context of the United States, I haven't seen any churchgoers hanging people (recently) nor witch burnings (recently), nor bombings (again, "recently").

Unless Tea Partiers or Limbaugh fans start shooting up towns with their own flags, pointing them out only damages us in the face of real threats.

a reply to: xuenchen

Obama's comments and everything coming out of this administration has been attempting to associate muslim murderers with Republicans and non-muslims. I don't think this is going to last much longer.

Everyone can see how insane this person is. Deranged and deluded is not an overstatement of the mental condition of this president.

If not crazy, that really just leaves that last explanation that no one wants to admit is a possibility.

a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

I'm not indulging on anything, and despite enjoying a good armageddon movie or book, I actually don't hope for any sort of doom.

I was specifically addressing your comments about how and why any sort of situation could or would go down and how the feds would react.

You live in a nanny county 3000+ miles away and in reality have no idea about US politics or the viewpoints held by the civilians other than the scraps you are fed online.

a reply to: theantediluvian

DaHaHa

-|-Obama served on board with Ayers-|-

Ayers is an ultra Left Wing domestic terrorist.

So is his wife || Bernardine Dohrn ||

Doh !!

originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: xuenchen

Obama's comments and everything coming out of this administration has been attempting to associate muslim murderers with Republicans

Funny how I see it different.

The Republicans that want so much freedom from the government are always the ones telling people how they should live.

I have always thought ISIS and the other extremists, remind me of the right...just way over the top version.

They have a thing against women, gays, minorities, in fact that sounds all to familiar...just not with the violence....YET.

a reply to: Onslaught2996

You are right, both Democrats and Republicans are socialists (from the French parliament left and right sides).

They both want to use state power to enforce behavior according to their social vision. Republicans a little, Democrats a lot.

originally posted by: Onslaught2996

originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: xuenchen

Obama's comments and everything coming out of this administration has been attempting to associate muslim murderers with Republicans

Funny how I see it different.

The Republicans that want so much freedom from the government are always the ones telling people how they should live.

I have always thought ISIS and the other extremists, remind me of the right...just way over the top version.

They have a thing against women, gays, minorities, in fact that sounds all to familiar...just not with the violence....YET.

Just the Republicans?

Come on now, be honest or make yourself look foolish!

Both parties need to revisit the meaning of freedom.

originally posted by: greencmp

Republicans a little, Democrats a lot.

..good one

originally posted by: seeker1963


Just the Republicans?

Come on now, be honest or make yourself look foolish!

Both parties need to revisit the meaning of freedom.

The scum politicians that call themselves dems maybe but the people they represent..I don't think so.

Freedom is something that should be allowed to all, despite religion, sexuality, sex, or race. Try telling them to the right though..freedom to them is something they feel only applies to certain groups.

a reply to: Onslaught2996

I think you are beginning to understand why people are not happy, neither party is representing the relatively identical interests of citizens.

Unless you specifically want to spend public money on something or award regulatory power to bureaucrats, you are probably libertarian leaning and freedom loving.

a reply to: doompornjunkie

That same tired old argument.


Where I'm from matters not.


Are you denying there is Americans who don't believe that the DHS is going to start a war with the people?

Of course not that would be stupid.

So how is me saying it any different from a US citizen saying the same thing?


And you weren't "specifically addressing" anything I said.

Because you've just said "how and why any sort of situation could or would go down"...

Which is a far cry from a specific "DHS war against the people" which is what I was specifically addressing.
I wasn't talking about "any situation"...
Just a very specific & specious one. Singular!



I like the "scraps fed online" statement right after proclaiming the UK is a "nanny state"...

I dare say with such a silly response I know much more about the U.S. than you do about the U.K!

Just one question,

Does this mean that our founding fathers were "terrorists"?

They took on the "status quo" and fought for our freedoms, the freedoms that we seem to be losing every single damn day.

I will not join any group that condones violence, but damn when is enough, enough?

a reply to: liejunkie01

FEMA thinks so.

FEMA: Founding Fathers Were Terrorists!

originally posted by: Onslaught2996

originally posted by: seeker1963


Just the Republicans?

Come on now, be honest or make yourself look foolish!

Both parties need to revisit the meaning of freedom.

The scum politicians that call themselves dems maybe but the people they represent..I don't think so.

Freedom is something that should be allowed to all, despite religion, sexuality, sex, or race. Try telling them to the right though..freedom to them is something they feel only applies to certain groups.

I think your anger is misplaced due to your beliefs in a political party my friend.

I agree that it is the Right that has opposed anything to do with those that are not heterosexual, but the left is attacking the damn food I eat, and neither damn party is doing anything to address the Corporations that are producing the harmful garbage!

There is plenty of blame to go around, but it is us who defend them based upon our preconceived beliefs that give them the power over us!

Your right! Freedom SHOULD be for all regardless of religion/sexuality/race!

Stop allowing the 2 party Corporation to make you pick a side!

Choose Freedom! Toss everything else in the trash bin!

How about a "Freedom Party"?

If you and I sat down to eat and drink. We would get along just fine!

Come on the internet and DEFEND your political party?

See what I mean?

We all want to be free!

a reply to: greencmp

It just seems to me that anyone with any common sense at all would see what this great nation is becoming/has become, but everyone is in their own selfish bubble trying to pretend that everything is a-ok. But in reality we/us/some of us can see that the founding fathers ideas are a lost ideology of what being free truly means.

I do not see the happy side of things. It is only going to get worse because ignorance is fueling the masses.

If one has not taken steps to look after their families well being, then they better get on it pronto because the battery in the clock is running on empty. There doesn't seem to be much time left.

a reply to: xuenchen

The quote was "Obama pal." Talk about beating a dead horse. Yes, they were both members of (actually different) boards of the Woods Fund in Chicago with tenures that overlapped for a few years. That makes them pals? Obama is no radical, he's a neoliberal just like the last half dozen American Presidents. As if a truly anti-establishment figure would be elected President.

originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
a reply to: xuenchen
Yeah, that's cute. : )

Is Bob Shapiro really Ann Coulter? : o

I think the CNN article is talking about homegrown terrorists, and there is a mention of potential heightened violence against law enforcement.

Interesting that the collectivists would call homegrown terrorists something connected to freedom.

Why not call them criminals?