It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
adverse reactions put no responsibility on anyone but malpractice does. The only thing that would be involved in a coverup is just changing some numbers on toxicology report. These days it could be done remotely from another computer somewhere.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: deadeyedick
How exactly is a rare adverse reaction to a vaccine "malpractice"? You know the chances of such a reaction are less than 1 in a million, right?
originally posted by: Hellhound604
But there is a choice. In Chinese culture there is acupuncture, and there are a lot of papers published about electric anaesthology.
a reply to: Pardon?
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: deadeyedick
Why would someone's adverse reaction be malpractice?
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: deadeyedick
Why would someone's adverse reaction be malpractice?
originally posted by: Pardon?
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: deadeyedick
Why would someone's adverse reaction be malpractice?
The only way an adverse reaction could be viewed as malpractice would be if the treatment was given when any known contraindications/allergies etc had been purposely ignored.