It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
Is it moral to eat animals when you dont need to?
Do you even care at all about the possible immorality of eating animals when you dont need to as there are alternatives that can fool anyone?
Do we have the right to inflict suffering on creatures we consider ourselves more advanced than, then slaughter and eat them when there is no need to?
originally posted by: Mianeye
Animals eat animals, i see myself as an animal, some animals would eat me in a heartbeat, "i'll eat them before they eat me".
I eat veggies on the side.
I would eat synthetic meat if there is no other option.
Btw, today i had mashed potato with peas and carrots, no meat, absolutely delicious
originally posted by: sine.nomine
a reply to: FormOfTheLord
You keep ignoring people's posts and repeating that this is a question of morality, but you keep equating animals with human beings. People eat animals to live, just like they eat vegetables to live. Some people can't get alternatives to the protein they get from eating meat. Many people can't get alternatives to the nutrients from seafood. Many animals eat each other to survive, and many eat their own species to survive. Reminder: you live on planet Earth.
Let me ask you this: is it moral to eat plants? Plants are living beings too. They react to emotion, they communicate with each other, and many animals rely on them being around to survive. What about the bug colonies that are wiped out by plowing fields? Do those insects not qualify as animals? What about the animals displaced by clearing farmland? What about the dwindling fresh water supply being depleted by irrigation?
What makes animals so special that I should consider it immoral to eat them in the first place? Things die so other things can live. Its the cycle of life.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
Slow down there dude im not ignoring anyone, I just cant address every flippant insult and expect to have a civil discussion now can I.
Nor can I address every post made as there are quite a few.
However to your the point of plants yes they do have leaves, brancehes roots, seeds, stems, and perhaps some kind of emotions or feelings feelings so to say. I believe there are levels of cousiousness in all things animate or inanimate, and in plants as well.
Do I believe its moral to kill and eat a plant if its not needed no.
But I do think if there was another way that was developed so that plants didnt need to be eaten then if we were still just killing plants and eating them for nothing more than our desire to do so would be immoral.
As to finding a way to live perhaps on light itself or 3d print food at the atomic level I think these techologies are on the way at some future point in time.
If there is a better way which causes less suffering I think the moral thing to do would be to take that path, but to each thier own.
Morality can be a personal question, so everyone has a different idea of what is moral for them I guess.
In our society we hold some ideas to be moral while some other ideals to be immoral, it really comes down to peoples perspective.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
originally posted by: nOraKat
a reply to: pheonix358
I think it all boils down to the experience of suffering, and not necessarily to the taking of life, especially plants or seeds/grains. just saying we should have consideration for suffering.
This is only my opinion of course, but I suspect grains and seeds do not experience suffering when you eat or cook them.
Those are frog legs in that video. The guy in the other video said the burger would cost about 20 dollars when it comes out , too much for me to pay for. I am happy for you and your family of veggie heads and props for your supior morals.
Listen I eat meat too. My reasoning is that I am not going to suffer in order to avoid meat altogether, but I try to be reasonable with how much and what I eat. I try to throw in legumes/beans (like soy bean products and eggs into my diet for protein also, so I am not always causing the slaughter of some animal.
Well its also a question of morality and the golden rule of, "Do onto others as we would have them do onto us."
If people are just eating meat because it tasts good would they eat human flesh as well?
Would many consider that immoral?
Alot of the arguments are that it tastes good, we are stronger, survival of the fittest, we are smarter, it was written in a book that god said it was cool, so we can eat them.
Well if the same was said of humans would people eat each other?
Or if another more advanced race showed up would we think its moral for them to eat us because they are more advanced?
How aware are plants? This is the central question behind a fascinating new book, “What a Plant Knows,” by Daniel Chamovitz, director of the Manna Center for Plant Biosciences at Tel Aviv University. A plant, he argues, can see, smell and feel. It can mount a defense when under siege, and warn its neighbors of trouble on the way. A plant can even be said to have a memory. But does this mean that plants think — or that one can speak of a “neuroscience” of the flower? Chamovitz answered questions from Mind Matters editor Gareth Cook.
People have to realize that plants are complex organisms that live rich, sensual lives. You know many of us relate to plants as inanimate objects, not much different from stones. Even the fact that many people substitute silk flowers for real ones, or artificial Christmas trees for a live one, is exemplary at some level of how we relate to plants. You know, I don’t know anyone who keeps a stuffed dog in place of a real one!
originally posted by: Xeven
Plants are self aware. Do you feel immoral for killing all those precious little baby tomatoes? Do you care? Are you in denial of the obvious truth?
Do Plants Think?
How aware are plants? This is the central question behind a fascinating new book, “What a Plant Knows,” by Daniel Chamovitz, director of the Manna Center for Plant Biosciences at Tel Aviv University. A plant, he argues, can see, smell and feel. It can mount a defense when under siege, and warn its neighbors of trouble on the way. A plant can even be said to have a memory. But does this mean that plants think — or that one can speak of a “neuroscience” of the flower? Chamovitz answered questions from Mind Matters editor Gareth Cook.
People have to realize that plants are complex organisms that live rich, sensual lives. You know many of us relate to plants as inanimate objects, not much different from stones. Even the fact that many people substitute silk flowers for real ones, or artificial Christmas trees for a live one, is exemplary at some level of how we relate to plants. You know, I don’t know anyone who keeps a stuffed dog in place of a real one!
originally posted by: Voyager1
I enjoy eating meat and vegetables and will continue to do so. If greasy meats put me in the ground 10 years early, so be it. That's how much I enjoy eating meat my friend.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
originally posted by: Xeven
Plants are self aware. Do you feel immoral for killing all those precious little baby tomatoes? Do you care? Are you in denial of the obvious truth?
Do Plants Think?
How aware are plants? This is the central question behind a fascinating new book, “What a Plant Knows,” by Daniel Chamovitz, director of the Manna Center for Plant Biosciences at Tel Aviv University. A plant, he argues, can see, smell and feel. It can mount a defense when under siege, and warn its neighbors of trouble on the way. A plant can even be said to have a memory. But does this mean that plants think — or that one can speak of a “neuroscience” of the flower? Chamovitz answered questions from Mind Matters editor Gareth Cook.
People have to realize that plants are complex organisms that live rich, sensual lives. You know many of us relate to plants as inanimate objects, not much different from stones. Even the fact that many people substitute silk flowers for real ones, or artificial Christmas trees for a live one, is exemplary at some level of how we relate to plants. You know, I don’t know anyone who keeps a stuffed dog in place of a real one!
Yes its immoral if theres another way.