It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shiloh7
In the desert religions theology invariably tells us that God is omniscient and the creator of all.
Sure its wonderful to stand in a beautiful forest, watch nature on a sunny day, breath and thank god for the world he has created. But where do the boundaries end on his creation, or do you draw the line on just our planet or our solar system - or the reality behind the idea that God is the creator of everything?
When you look at our home being a minute part of the Milky Way which consists of 10 trillion planets with a super blackhole in the middle it it a hard concept to think about - which is probably why you hear very little about Gods real creative ability from the men in frocks.
However when you realise that our galaxy is only one with our universe and that our universe consists of 200 million galaxies which brings us to the final figure, just our universe alone and we know there are numerable universes in the heavens, we are looking at 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets - do you believe that God created everything which is all of them?
originally posted by: Ignatian
I believe in ONE God, father almighty, maker of heaven and earth, of all that is seen, and unseen.
"The things that no eye has seen and no ear has heard, things BEYOND THE MIND OF MAN, all that God has prepared for those who love him". (1 Corinthians 2)(This refers to heaven?, but apropos nonetheless)
Anything "beyond the mind of man", cannot, and will never be understood. It's that simple. Why, therefore "waste time" even trying to comprehend the abstraction that is the word "God"?
Here's a nugget: God cannot predict the future. Because there's no such thing as the "future" with God. And also, No such thing as the "past". There's no such thing as time, therefore, there is no past, and no future. Time is an earthly concept. With God, there is only now. The eternal now. That's not comprehendible by the human mind. Impossible. So I don't "waste time" trying.
a reply to: Shiloh7
originally posted by: WeAreAllTheSame
How did evolution create something as complex as the eye?
Even Darwin had no answer.
All parts of the eye had to have been present. To have evolved separately is an absurdity.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: WeAreAllTheSame
How did evolution create something as complex as the eye?
Even Darwin had no answer.
All parts of the eye had to have been present. To have evolved separately is an absurdity.
Forget the eye, what about DNA?
Which came first the DNA or the amino acid?
originally posted by: WarminIndy
That long string of proteins didn't just put themselves together in the primordial ooze.
originally posted by: JUhrman
originally posted by: WarminIndy
That long string of proteins didn't just put themselves together in the primordial ooze.
And why not?
I believe in a creative power in nature, and I believe that such a power is found within and not without. Mankind can use consciousness to assemble matter or ideas into higher level structures.
Why couldn't matter do the same given enough time and the right context?
I already shown how the quantic uncertainty principle could be nothing but the expression of free will at atomic level. A free will much more limited than the human one, but a free will nevertheless.
If you deny free will in nature then humans are nothing more than biological robots and nothing you are doing is the result of choice, only the outcome of a deterministic formula.
"God" isn't some unknowable external character. That source of life is inside yourself right now as we speak. It wants nothing but to evolve into more complex lifeforms and higher levels of consciousness. You can ignore it but you cannot deny its existence.
originally posted by: WarminIndy
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
originally posted by: WeAreAllTheSame
How did evolution create something as complex as the eye?
Even Darwin had no answer.
All parts of the eye had to have been present. To have evolved separately is an absurdity.
Forget the eye, what about DNA?
Which came first the DNA or the amino acid?
And where did the amino acid come from?
That long string of proteins didn't just put themselves together in the primordial ooze. But you forget, that theory has now been tossed out the window.
originally posted by: roth1
So when was god created and how?