It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Could man (the male human) be the devil or the devil's seed?
originally posted by: ancientthunder
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
Maybe your not a real woman, no offence intended there. Maybe none of us know what a real woman is,in a sense I feel the OP is saying that we are a demonic version that came out of adams rib. Adam being the new kid in town ( on earth ) Anyway, what is here is what we have!
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
I'm a woman. I came from a sperm too. I too have testosterone in my body.
Your logic is flawed.
If you really believe that men aren't required for reproduction, then hundreds of thousands (if not millions or billions) of years of evolution would like to talk to you. Show me a single documented example of a female human reproducing without a male's genetic material. Just one, please.
originally posted by: johndeere2020
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
I'm a woman. I came from a sperm too. I too have testosterone in my body.
Your logic is flawed.
Not really, the genetic material passed on to you from the sperm originally came from the mother of your father.
My point is, an egg cell(s) by themselves cannot make a man but they can make women/females by themselves - without sperm!
Sperm cells by themselves cannot make anything - this is another mythical quality of the Demiurge - they always needed something to build on, egg cells (or other living cells) for the sperm and the dark matter for our "fake Universe".
But a single egg cell could birth a copy of its mother on their own or an entirely new and perfectly normal individual by recombining the genetic material between two eggs. This is common in nature among reptiles and can be performed on mammals artificially with a great degree of success. But you can't do this on sperm cells alone.
This shows the redundancy of the sperm cell, and the Demiurge. They share another quality of creating a need that didn't existed before.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
When I took a bath this evening, I reassured myself that I was in fact, a woman. Naughty bits and all. I'm not a religious person so this whole "Demiurge/Adam" nonsense is complete BS to me.
For someone who "dislikes the notion of religion" you sure base your entire argument on religious grounds.
originally posted by: johndeere2020
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
When I took a bath this evening, I reassured myself that I was in fact, a woman. Naughty bits and all. I'm not a religious person so this whole "Demiurge/Adam" nonsense is complete BS to me.
I dislike the whole notion of religion for the most popular religions in the world by sheer numbers - Christianity and Islam discriminates women.
The god they worship is the Demiurge (sperm cell) - the "creative seed" of men. Which arrogantly claims to be the "creator" but nah, it's actually the feminine aspect.. Even science thinks so!
Sexual reproduction requires the combination of genetic material from two parents. This is achieved when two sex cells called gametes fuse together. This process is called fertilisation and can happen either outside the female (external fertilisation) or inside (internal fertilisation)
originally posted by: johndeere2020
Even science thinks so!
Show me a single documented example of a female human reproducing without a male's genetic material. Just one, please.
But one could argue that Jesus was the son of God, who has been described by nearly all versions of Bible as a male.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: ScientificRailgun
Show me a single documented example of a female human reproducing without a male's genetic material. Just one, please.
Jesus.
(I think the story is BS, just playing devil's advocate)