It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As more tourists are drawn to experience the city's marijuana culture, thousands of jobs have been created, including a cannabis critic for the local paper.
Police officers were worried when Amendment 64 first passed, a Denver police officer tells Sherren, but that fear turned out to be unfounded.
"We found there hasn't been much of a change of anything," he said. "Basically, officers aren't seeing much of a change in how they do police work."
Looks much like a win win for Colorado......
edit on 19-1-2015 by stirling because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
a reply to: mOjOm
Ok, so what's next on our list???
The rest of the drug war.
And prostitution.
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
a reply to: mOjOm
Ok, so what's next on our list???
The rest of the drug war.
And prostitution.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
a reply to: mOjOm
Ok, so what's next on our list???
The rest of the drug war.
And prostitution.
Allow me to be the first to say "no." This is exactly the last thing anyone who supports decriminalization of MJ should be advocating at this time. One of the most listened to, most impactful arguments supporting the new decriminalization laws focused on weed's impact on health and society and the rational argument that the health impact was less than that of tobacco while the societal impacts were less than those of alcohol. Those arguments CANNOT be rationally made about hard drugs or prostitution.
If you want to force the majority of non-pot users who support the push for decriminalization to do an about face and demand a full return to prohibition, raising the "OK, now we need to legalize all vices" argument is a great first step. There is logic behind the legal banning of some substances and some activities... as the manufacture, use, and practice of these does not constitute "victimless" activity.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: LewsTherinThelamon
a reply to: mOjOm
Ok, so what's next on our list???
The rest of the drug war.
And prostitution.
Allow me to be the first to say "no." This is exactly the last thing anyone who supports decriminalization of MJ should be advocating at this time. One of the most listened to, most impactful arguments supporting the new decriminalization laws focused on weed's impact on health and society and the rational argument that the health impact was less than that of tobacco while the societal impacts were less than those of alcohol. Those arguments CANNOT be rationally made about hard drugs or prostitution.
If you want to force the majority of non-pot users who support the push for decriminalization to do an about face and demand a full return to prohibition, raising the "OK, now we need to legalize all vices" argument is a great first step. There is logic behind the legal banning of some substances and some activities... as the manufacture, use, and practice of these does not constitute "victimless" activity.
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
Chances are that any societal impact won't be known for a while, give it 10 years, then 20 and see how it affects the emerging generations and their kids, they should be doing a lot of research on it, valuable information stats.
Allow me to be the first to say "no." This is exactly the last thing anyone who supports decriminalization of MJ should be advocating at this time.
One of the most listened to, most impactful arguments supporting the new decriminalization laws focused on weed's impact on health and society and the rational argument that the health impact was less than that of tobacco while the societal impacts were less than those of alcohol. Those arguments CANNOT be rationally made about hard drugs or prostitution.
If you want to force the majority of non-pot users who support the push for decriminalization to do an about face and demand a full return to prohibition, raising the "OK, now we need to legalize all vices" argument is a great first step.
There is logic behind the legal banning of some substances and some activities... as the manufacture, use, and practice of these does not constitute "victimless" activity.