It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: OneManArmy
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: OneManArmy
originally posted by: draknoir2
I find it amusing how some are so casual and matter-of-fact in their use of mythological black projects built with mythological technology as the most reasonable explanations for UFO sightings.
The TR6 utilizes five electrogravitic generators for propulsion and is considered a “VTOL” craft not needing a runway.
Electrogravitic generator? Sez so on "Agent D" and "Agent K's" blog, so it must be a real thing.
A simple google search gave me a few links including this one.
It states that the term was in widespread use in 1956. NINETEEN FIFTY SIX!!!
Does anybody use google?
I thought we were supposed to be researchers?
The whole damn problem with the truth community is the failure to check facts.
It would seem the debunking community has the same problem.
Apparently Nikola Tesla was the first to propose Electrogravitic generators.
Is there anything that guy didnt invent?
That was a joke question.
Am I to understand that you googled a Brazilian Tesla fan blog of a "private research lab" located near, get this, Lake Paranoa :-)) and presented it as proof of a functional electrogravitic generator, and, by extension, proof of a TR3B propulsion system?
Is that what you're doing?
No what I was doing was highlighting that the technology has been researched, was considered a valid propulsion system as far back as the 1920's. It does exist, even if only the realms of scientific speculation.
And by extension showing you to be seriously lacking in checking facts.
Are you saying now that these guys named the Lake?
Yes its funny, but its true. Are you saying that all the embassies and consulates and the university around the lake in the capital of Brazil are "paranoid" If you look really closely, you might realise they are two different words.
Just like Ball and Bill. Not exactly the same now eh?
Instead of being so fast to jump in and start making denials, at least do a basic google search, is that too much to ask?
How does speculation equal existence?
Here's a hint: It doesn't.
Any knucklehead can type a word into a search box and link the results. That doesn't make it "research".
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: OneManArmy
originally posted by: draknoir2
originally posted by: OneManArmy
originally posted by: draknoir2
I find it amusing how some are so casual and matter-of-fact in their use of mythological black projects built with mythological technology as the most reasonable explanations for UFO sightings.
The TR6 utilizes five electrogravitic generators for propulsion and is considered a “VTOL” craft not needing a runway.
Electrogravitic generator? Sez so on "Agent D" and "Agent K's" blog, so it must be a real thing.
A simple google search gave me a few links including this one.
It states that the term was in widespread use in 1956. NINETEEN FIFTY SIX!!!
Does anybody use google?
I thought we were supposed to be researchers?
The whole damn problem with the truth community is the failure to check facts.
It would seem the debunking community has the same problem.
Apparently Nikola Tesla was the first to propose Electrogravitic generators.
Is there anything that guy didnt invent?
That was a joke question.
Am I to understand that you googled a Brazilian Tesla fan blog of a "private research lab" located near, get this, Lake Paranoa :-)) and presented it as proof of a functional electrogravitic generator, and, by extension, proof of a TR3B propulsion system?
Is that what you're doing?
No what I was doing was highlighting that the technology has been researched, was considered a valid propulsion system as far back as the 1920's. It does exist, even if only the realms of scientific speculation.
And by extension showing you to be seriously lacking in checking facts.
Are you saying now that these guys named the Lake?
Yes its funny, but its true. Are you saying that all the embassies and consulates and the university around the lake in the capital of Brazil are "paranoid" If you look really closely, you might realise they are two different words.
Just like Ball and Bill. Not exactly the same now eh?
Instead of being so fast to jump in and start making denials, at least do a basic google search, is that too much to ask?
How does speculation equal existence?
Here's a hint: It doesn't.
Any knucklehead can type a word into a search box and link the results. That doesn't make it "research".
originally posted by: draknoir2
I find it amusing how some are so casual and matter-of-fact in their use of mythological black projects built with mythological technology as the most reasonable explanations for UFO sightings.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: draknoir2
I find it amusing how some are so casual and matter-of-fact in their use of mythological black projects built with mythological technology as the most reasonable explanations for UFO sightings.
At this point, I think everybody understands that leprechaun technology has been severely underestimated over the past couple hundred years, and that their work in gravitachyons makes them the most likely candidate for many large UFOs that leave behind pots of gold.
originally posted by: _BoneZ_
a reply to: Bloodydagger
There was no single large craft. I'll be making a thread later this week laying to rest the Phoenix Lights incident once and for all.
originally posted by: Charizard
Sounds great in theory, but where's the proof this TELOS craft actually exists? Until we can prove it's a real craft with the same capabilities and/or design that is stated, then it just sounds like someone designing a fictional craft to fit the bill of the Phoenix craft.
I think it's very likely but we'll probably never know for sure unless one crashes in a populated area or a whistleblower sneaks some photographs/video of the craft and makes them public.
The Boomerang however is always massive in scope when its reported. Up to 1-2 miles wide. The one in Phoenix was estimated to be OVER a mile wide.
originally posted by: aboutface
a reply to: Blueracer
I tend to agree with you. These craft seem to be seen only over the USA, so it would seem to be American military. I don't think the government does anything to have us believe they are UFOs though. IMO, it's people jumping to that conclusion when they try to find some kind of explanation.
originally posted by: DenyObfuscation
a reply to: Bloodydagger
The Boomerang however is always massive in scope when its reported. Up to 1-2 miles wide. The one in Phoenix was estimated to be OVER a mile wide.
Then what is this in your OP?