It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: glend
a reply to: Shamrock6
Revenge for what? I can imagine family members of the 1/2 million children killed on sanctions over non-existant wmd might take unkindly to west for killing their children but people don't care about cartoons to the point of killing people over them. Islam teaches tolerance and forbids murder of innocent people. The persons responsible for these atrocities do not follow the Koran.
originally posted by: glend
a reply to: Shamrock6
I am sitting behind a computer as are you so I cannot deny anything but I also don't assume anything. And I certainly don't take the Military–industrial–media complex as gospel. So I try reason through the logic, who profits from such acts and why. It always seems that Muslums don't profit from any acts of terrorism, but the west certainly profits from their slaughter. Funny that!
originally posted by: SpaDe_
a reply to: thesmokingman
You seriously need to do some more research on ballistics before commenting. I guarantee they were using military surplus full metal jacket rounds which are super abundant and not hollow point rounds like the video you posted. Your assumptions of what a 7.62X39 FMJ round are capable of doing is based in a combination of Hollywood and fantasy.
Full metal jacket rounds are not intended to fragment upon penetration, they are meant for deeper penetration and do not fragment unless striking bone or something more dense than flesh. In the short amount of time that film of the shooting was there would not have been a pool of blood. It was mere seconds, clearly not enough time for blood to pool. There would also be no blood splatter because of the direction of the entering bullet. The exit wound would have been under the victim.
originally posted by: VirusGuard
I am remaining open about this being a false flag after I viewed a viedo on Youtube that shows the policeman being shot in the head by an AK-47 at close range and no blood seems to come out and his head does not joit backwards as he gets hit.
One moment the MSM press is saying its ISIS terrorists and the next second they are saying its AL-CIAda so i am just not sure if we are getting half the truth right now.
originally posted by: 8675309jennyThe shot was a miss.
originally posted by: 8675309jennyYou can clearly see it hits the sidewalk like 10inches in front of the guys face.
originally posted by: 8675309jennyThe officer succumbed to his injuries from the multiple other gunshot wounds he had already sustained.
originally posted by: Annunak1
I still find it odd that the 3 terrorists from yesterday left their ID behind in one of the getaway cars. i mean seriousley? are you that stupid. Because from what i've heard this was a professional attack. And last i checked professionals don't leave ID's in the getaway car. That alone smells like fish. But it could also be they are just very stupid. i don't know what to believe these days. Too much lies in the media so much confusion arghhhh
Interesting video. If a large number of moderate muslims share the same views as extremists (men and women shouldn't sit together in public, death penalty etc) then why come and live in a liberal western country?