It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The verse is Matthew 5:18 that you are quoting.
What Jesus was saying is that the Torah and the Prophets would not have one jot or tittle pass away from it until all of it was fulfilled. Meaning, every single prophecy given therein would come to pass.
You jump from Law, what Jesus was talking about, to something else that he was not talking about.
You missed my point entirely. When Jesus said "the law" He was saying "the Torah", not the Mosaic Law. In Hebrew the word "law" is "torah".
You jump from Law, what Jesus was talking about, to something else that he was not talking about.
Was "every single prophecy given therein come to pass" then?
. . . the Mosaic Law is of none effect since Calvary.
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: ntech
The fig tree is Israel during the 70th Week, not before. The fig tree sprouting is Israel believing in Christ up to His return. Currently, Israel is occupied by athiest Jews and Law observers who reject Christ, so there is no way that the Fig Tree parable can apply to the Zionist State. The fig tree is still dead.
Like I said Israel only has 7 years remaining. There is no way that modern day Israel is fulfillment of prophecy. We will know when the prophecy is fulfilled when the Jews are ALL regathered and resurrected at once.
10"I will pour out on the house of David and on the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the Spirit of grace and of supplication, so that they will look on Me whom they have pierced; and they will mourn for Him, as one mourns for an only son, and they will weep bitterly over Him like the bitter weeping over a firstborn. 11"In that day there will be great mourning in Jerusalem, like the mourning of Hadadrimmon in the plain of Megiddo.…
6“On that day I will make the clans of Judah like a blazing pot in the midst of wood, like a flaming torch among sheaves. And they shall devour to the right and to the left all the surrounding peoples, while Jerusalem shall again be inhabited in its place, in Jerusalem.
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: jmdewey60
You jump from Law, what Jesus was talking about, to something else that he was not talking about.
No I didn't, you misunderstood what I said. I said when Jesus was saying "law" He was talking about the Torah ("law" in Hebrew), not the law of Moses contained in the Torah. He wasn't saying the Mosaic Law would be in effect till heaven and Earth pass away. That would make Him a liar, the Mosaic Law is of none effect since Calvary.
"Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. "For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. "Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.…
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: NOTurTypical
What Jesus was saying is that the Torah and the Prophets would not have one jot or tittle pass away from it until all of it was fulfilled. Meaning, every single prophecy given therein would come to pass.
So, take what you said about "Law and Prophets" and take it into the other direction, meaning, as this way of expressing the entire tradition, but with the direct reference to the legalities, rather than your assumption of the current specific emphases on prophetic predictions of future events.
The only future event that Jesus was referring to is the reality that the world will keep going on, with people living, and there needing to be something that governs how they carry that out.
Zechariah is written with a setting that goes back to the Babylonian captivity, and plays off the prophecy of Daniel and the seventy years that it was supposed to have lasted, where the question is, "Where is this restoration of the Jews who had been held all this time, and why are we not back in Jerusalem and back to our type of prosperity that formerly it had enjoyed?"
This prophecy clearly shows Jews living in Jerusalem at the time of this event.
If you look at what Jesus is doing, he says that there is a law that will always stand, but then goes on to demonstrate that the old written law was entirely inadequate to describe the real law that strictly follows spiritual principles.
This idea that the law is "of no effect" is yet another really bad christian urban legend.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: LogarockZechariah is written with a setting that goes back to the Babylonian captivity, and plays off the prophecy of Daniel and the seventy years that it was supposed to have lasted, where the question is, "Where is this restoration of the Jews that had been held all this time, and why are we not back in Jerusalem and back to our type of prosperity that formerly it had enjoyed?"
This prophecy clearly shows Jews living in Jerusalem at the time of this event.
So all the things in the book that you are calling prophecies really aren't, but just a poetic retelling of the story of the restoration, which was written after the Jews had returned, but were bitterly disappointed with how Jerusalem remained an unimportant backwater while cities around it, inhabited by gentiles, were getting wealthy off of trade in the imperial days of the Persian hegemony.
There is a lot of problems involved if you think these are all things that have to come true. You can't "fix" it by saying that all of this stuff was about things that would eventually happen thousands of years later. The book is concerned about what they saw as the closing of their widow of opportunity with the evident soon demise of the Persian Empire, thanks to incursions by the Greeks, and the future loss of their patronage that Judea had been enjoying.
One primary problem I see with your interpretation here about Zechariah is that the House of David was never reestablished in Jerusalem after the captivity.
This part was adopted by New Testament writers to apply to Jesus, but it is not then lifted up out of that book, because of that, to be especially scrutinized as to any subsequent fulfillments.
And how could Zechariah be talking about "He whom they pierced" if it wasn't prophecy? And just who were they mourning in their poetry?
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: NOTurTypical
What Jesus was saying is that the Torah and the Prophets would not have one jot or tittle pass away from it until all of it was fulfilled. Meaning, every single prophecy given therein would come to pass.
So, take what you said about "Law and Prophets" and take it into the other direction, meaning, as this way of expressing the entire tradition, but with the direct reference to the legalities, rather than your assumption of the current specific emphases on prophetic predictions of future events.
The only future event that Jesus was referring to is the reality that the world will keep going on, with people living, and there needing to be something that governs how they carry that out.
Probably the ugliest thing ever done to the law is the very old idea that the commandments could be violated "in Christ" without repercussions. Even Zacchaeus made restitution according to the law and more after "salvation had come to his house".
This idea of freedom to break the law, in its many forms and shades of color, is not Jesus. Its that other guy "Jebus" that folks make fun of all the time.
"Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. "For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. "Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.…
Did you ever take a good look at this? From Mathew 5.
5 But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed, saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the law of Moses. 6 And the apostles and elders came together for to consider of this matter...
19 Wherefore my sentence is, that we trouble not them, which from among the Gentiles are turned to God: 20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
originally posted by: jmdewey60
a reply to: NOTurTypicalWas "every single prophecy given therein come to pass" then?
. . . the Mosaic Law is of none effect since Calvary.