posted on Dec, 21 2014 @ 11:12 AM
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: AlephBet
You can't go past this one:
That site is a treasure trove of knowledge, and it is filled with papers written by accomplished scholars and students alike.
As for your link I could not recommend it. But if gunfights with aliens and exopolitics are your cup of tea then by all means check it out.
Thanks for the link. Do you think there is a link between the age of mankind and the age of the universe as a whole? How much of a parallel can we
draw between the early impressions mankind had of their ancient creators?
Personally, I consider the ancient perspective just as valuable. We live in a large universe and early man evidently had contact with higher
knowledge from outside our ecosystem. No matter how crude their descriptions, we cannot discount the knowledge provided.
As a simple example, Genesis outlines the tree of knowledge (language) and the tree of life (DNA). From this simple description, we see a parallel
between the two languages of the Bible (Hebrew and Greek). East and West languages are parallel to DNA in many unexplainable ways. Hebrew is a
concrete languages of 22 letters. Greek is an abstract language of 24. Together, the 46 letters mirror the 46 chromosomes used to design the chiral
mind of man. Not only is our mind chiral, but so is our body mirrored in this manner. Genesis outlines our reality as an image created
It goes on to name the Father the Aleph Bet, who writes the Word as the primary creative process of both trees. I hardly think we can discount this
parallel. How many articles in the link you provided does it take to outline the simple version in Genesis? Genesis 1 outlines the first two
principles / principals of the process as Elohim (Father) and Ruach Elohim (Mother). They create the Son Adam, or the human species. I do not think
any of this is literal, but represents the easiest way for us to get a glimpse of what it takes to render a universe with letters of programming into
words (letters of the Father into a Cup/Matrix/Womb).
Seen by this light, can we simply dismiss the out of place evidence? I think both perspectives are valuable. Thank you for the link.
edit on 21-12-2014 by AlephBet because: (no reason given)