It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: CJCrawley
a reply to: andy06shake
And we did indeed goto the Moon hence the laser light we are able to bounce of the reflector placed there by Man.
Not sure about the laser light thingy.
It's always touted as incontrovertible proof, but when you consider that so many QUADRILLION photons are in one laser beam, and yet they're lucky to get ONE photon reflected back....what's up with that?
If you shine a torch at a mirror, you get EXACTLY THE SAME amount of light reflected back!
Sounds like they are just aiming at the Moon's surface and a tiny, tiny bit is reflected back off it.
Otherwise where'd all those quadrillions of photons disappear to?
originally posted by: CoriSCapnSkip
There seem to be so many Holocaust, moon landing, and Newtown/Sandy Hook massacre deniers, 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and Obama Kenya birthers, among many other topics, just on this site let alone other places, just wondered if there is any undisputed fact that anybody agrees on other than that there are enough crackpots to go around.
There seem to be so many Holocaust, moon landing, and Newtown/Sandy Hook massacre deniers, 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and Obama Kenya birthers, among many other topics, just on this site let alone other places, just wondered if there is any undisputed fact that anybody agrees on other than
originally posted by: nonspecific
How about chemtrails?
The RAF admitted spraying the uk population for decades with chemicals for research purposes including ecoli and cadmium.
link
originally posted by: Cancerwarrior
Coming to a conspiracy website and then asking people why they are on a conspiracy website is a little bit merry go round don't you think?
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Pitou
The Nazi holocaust happened, the evidence and witness accounts speak for themselves in that regard. There is however reason to question the numbers involved considering that the logistics required to kill and dispose of so many people and bodies within the time period allowed was simply beyond there capability. Point of fact Stalin killed more people than Hitler ever did which takes nothing away from the tragedy or evil perpetrated by both nefarious individuals.
originally posted by: nonspecific
I have to confess a very poor understanding of the history of ww2.
Did they deny the existence of the holocaust whilst others believed that it was happening?
In order for it to be a conspiracy surley something has to be covered up/hidden AND People need to suspect that it going on?
a reply to: andy06shake
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: nonspecific
Well i imagine when they put the poor people on the trains they did not tell them their final destination or fate. Otherwise pandemonium would have ensured. Communication mediums were somewhat different back then probably a hell of a lot easier to lead lambs to the slaughter.
originally posted by: projectbane
The one I find hardest to believe after looking into it is the Holocaust!!! Since 1890 the number 6 millions jews has plagued the US newspapers for decades till the "holocaust" happened....6 million jews!!
The number was already predetermined...years in advance.
originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
There is never going to be an accurate re-telling of an event.
All you can expect is your story, my story and "his story".
originally posted by: DJW001
ATS is a monument to the struggle to comprehend one's place in the world through the power of narrative. All too often, these struggles pit subjective belief against objective events, and the subjective, often irrational, belief triumphs.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: 8675309jenny
Future generation's will be rather hard pressed to learn from there mistakes without an accurate account of what happened previously aka history. So I would have to say history is indeed rather important.
I think it'd be very dangerous if everyone agreed on everything and never questionned the statu quo