It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
im sure most bond fans will say i am going about it wrong and that roger moore or perhaps sean connery are the only true bonds and i should start at the beginning, but i wont.
originally posted by: WP4YT
In a nutshell
Sean Connery Bond Movies:
Good plots, good acting. No special effects at all, very slow, long, drawn out scenes typical of older movies. Not a lot of focus on gadgets or tech. Bond is serious, misogynistic, with a little bit of perverted humor.
Roger Moore bond movies:
Bad plots, bad acting, especially the later ones. Lots of campy humor and jokes. Bad special effects, and stupid Benny hill type sound effects. Almost feel like these movies are a comedy and not an action movie. Bond is a goofball.
Timothy Dalton bond movies:
Good acting, OK plots. Very serious. Not really any special effects or anything crazy. Bond is very serious, no humor at all, a cold killer. Some people don't like Dalton, but he plays perfectly who Bond was in the books.
Pierce Brosnan bond movies:
OK acting, OK plots. LOTS of special effects and cgi, to a point in the later movies where it's way too much. Lots of focus on the bond gadgets and tech. Bond is kind of a meathead, but not a goofball like Roger Moore was. He is similar to Connery in that he's a little perverted, though not as swift and sly as Connery was.
Daniel Craig bond movies:
Good acting, confusing plots. Gritty, violent. No special effects or cgi. No focus on gadgets or tech. Shaky camera. Craig is cold blooded and lacks humor, similar to Dalton.
Overall, I like Connery the best, however Dalton and Craig are closer to who Bond was supposed to be. Moore, bless his heart, is a good actor, but most of the the bond movies he was in were garbage.
A few Roger Moore movies were really good. But he was in so many other bad ones.