Embryology quiz.

Iam fascinated by Embryology and would like you just to take this little quiz.




These are various animals at a very early stage in their growth...which is the human one?.







A bit hard well here is the 2nd stage..





I just love how we are very much the same at these stages. To me it backs up how connected we are evolutionary.

I will post the answer in a while enjoy .

I think we are the last one.
The first one I think is frog. The second fish . The fourth one I think is chicken. The rest ???? reply to: boymonkey74

a reply to: boymonkey74

Are those drawings by Ernst Haeckel?

a reply to: AutumnWitch657

All will be revealed soon.

a reply to: IndependentAgent

Yup

a reply to: AutumnWitch657

Fourth one? I only see two pictures there, and I'm pretty sure the first one is the human one.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

Each pic has 8 different species.
the 2nd pic are the same animals as the first.

a reply to: boymonkey74

Yup, he was convicted of fraud!!

a reply to: IndependentAgent

Doesn't matter the pics are true representations.

No mention of fraud here.

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: boymonkey74

Oh I thought they were just embryos in different stages of development. My bad. I misread your opening post.

a reply to: boymonkey74

His drawing was fraud, does not look like the real thing. That is why he was conficted

a reply to: IndependentAgent

Got any evidence for that? The wiki page says otherwise.

a reply to: IndependentAgent

Source, please.

scienceworld.wolfram.com...

L. Rutimeyer, a professor of zoology and comparative anatomy, at the University of Basel, reviewed Haeckel's work and exposed the fraud (Rutimeyer 1868). He stated, "There is considerable manufacturing of scientific evidence perpetrated. Yet the author has been very careful not to let the reader become aware of this state of affairs" Rutimeyer showed that the prints of dog and human embryo were not simply similar, but were one and the same woodcut print. He also pointed out that the prints of tortoise, chicken, and dog were also from the same woodcut print. As evidence, he looked up the Bischoff dog embryo print that Haeckel claimed he obtained from Bischoff and showed that it did not look like the one published by Haeckel alongside the supposedly human embryo (the two of which were identical).

www.evolutionnews.org...

a reply to: IndependentAgent

Bah I stand corrected.

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: AutumnWitch657

All will be revealed soon.

Do you moonlight as a crazy eight ball?

a reply to: IndependentAgent

Evolutionnews is not a reputable source. It is an anti science creationist site. Do you have any reputable unbiased sources that confirm that?

EDIT: Nevermind. Just saw the link at the top. Too bad. I hate when people are dishonest. They make all scientists look bad.

Felix has the longer tail ...

www.talkorigins.org...

Some call them PARASITEs by the way. I NEVER heard that until I heard from a poster.