Protesters, Opportunists, and the law of the land. Good Luck America, we got a big [snip] going on, Babylonian style.
Well I know many mild mannered, law abiding, professional black men who all have at least one humiliating horror story about interacting with the
police that really shouldnt have happened at all, so there is an obvious issue there. But onto these protests... uhhh, well... we either have multiple
corrupt grand juries now or a rather large part of the population doesn't agree with the law of the land. Or I guess if I adjust my tinfoil hat a
little more, we have both.
There are alot of cases, just like these two, with lots of different races involved. Suspect does not comply with officers orders, then someone gets
hurt or killed. In this country we have a right to bare arms, so if I have a gun (whether you know I have the gun or not) and I slap you, and you have
a gun, in this country, you can shoot me for slapping you, bc I attacked you, and I could possibly shoot you next.
ALL Americans have the right to use and bare arms if they feel threatened, from priests, to cops, to criminals.
So protesting over these cases is basically a protest against every time a bonafide suspect was killed by a police officer. Its also a protest
against anyone being able to properly protect themselves. You cant have it both ways, either police get the same rights to self defense as everyone
else or they have a different set of rights altogether. In the meantime, if you do not comply with an officers orders, you can be killed, and no
amount of protests are going to change those laws, bc its basically woven into the finer details of the constitution, for all Americans, police
included.
I guess my issue, as always, why are Americans protesting these trials? If people want to protest about authoritative inequality for law abiding
citizens, then why are these organizers using examples of non-law abiding citizens? It just seems like the real problem is brushed to the side and
pushed out of site on purpose. Rodney King getting beat senseless once he was already subdued and that guy that got a broomstick up his ass are the
type of cases for these protests.. not these cases.
I personally think its very convenient that the govt has been watching us through the NSA and now bc of these protests, officers will soon all have
cameras strapped to them, which is an actual violation of privacy in the constitution. To me its just more excuses for more surveillance. I am sure
there are people who protest just to say more peace and equality, but unfortunately it doesn't seem this movement is really geared toward making a
change in that direction at all. Too much just doesn't add up, or the education system in this country is really, really, broken for people not to
accept these last two grand juries as simply the way our laws have always worked. What I do know is that if this many Americans believe our justice
system is broken, especially for cases like these, then this country def. needs help.
If these civilians didn't decide to indict these cops, then they didn't break the law. I am not going to believe that these jurors, who are normal
everyday people, lied to save these cops from punishment. Social inequality starts and ends with whoever is voted into office. That's who makes the
final call on these types of things. Its not cops, jurors, or anyone doing a "job". Its all about the civilians and the Government officials "voted"
into a position. That's why historically large protests take place on Capital Hill, because that's the only place that make change at the end of the
day, for an issue this large. Has there been a single protest in Washington DC in the last couple weeks?
edit on 3-12-2014 by tonycodes
because: (no reason given)
edit on 3-12-2014 by tonycodes because: (no reason given)
edit on 3-12-2014 by tonycodes
because: (no reason given)
edit on 4/12/2014 by Gemwolf because: Removed sexual term