UFO's Pose no Threat

So do aliens travel to our planet and visit no one? As all the government Area 51 type stories are not true? And the claim by the government, "About 95% can be identified, and the other 5% remain unknown, however pose no threat." Is a true statement?

Or has it changed? Have the 5% been identified? And, there are no UFOs?

The U.S. government has no evidence that any life exists outside our planet, or that an extraterrestrial presence has contacted or engaged any member of the human race. In addition, there is no credible information to suggest that any evidence is being hidden from the public's eye.

However, that doesn't mean the subject of life outside our planet isn't being discussed or explored. In fact, there are a number of projects working toward the goal of understanding if life can or does exist off Earth.

White House response to ET

The above is written by Phil Larson, who recently tweeted he is no longer working for the White House as of last week. Not sure what his next plans are. Phil Larson Twitter

Obama does have some pro-UFO staff:
John Podesta White House


Where is the recent statement from John Podesta on UFO's? His main focus has been climate change.

What do you think?

UFO's Pose no Threat?

or

No UFO's at all?

Or a third question that goes against the others...


There is UFOs, and some are a threat...

Just wait till the fight over humanity heats up.

The reason there's been no invasion is because more than one E.T faction on the chess boards have been putting each other in check.

But this is a timed match. And when the numbers are nearly gone they will make their last moves out of desperation.
The timing is dependant on Earth. If a cataklysm happens soon then the time is up. But if we threaten ourselves with technology the time will also be up.

Yeah sure we are posing threats to ourselves. But i ment enough to actually make humanity scarce. Nothing has happened as of yet to cause a culling of humanity.

Now if A.I began converting everyone into cybermen. That would be a different story. And that's coming in our near future.

OK, the White House was sent a petition that asked them to acknowledge if they are covering up an extraterrestrial presence. They deny that they are covering up an extraterrestrial presence. Then they don't release statements on UFO's. Why would they admit that they were covering up extraterrestrial presence (just because of a petition)?
They just released a generic statement and went back to business as usual.

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Or a third question that goes against the others...


There is UFOs, and some are a threat...

Well that would mean we have some type of defense against them and have been able to keep people out of harm's way from UFO's. However where is a case of a UFO being dangerous? Do we have defense against UFO's currently? Are we using some secret Darpa or Lockheed Martin technology to defend ourselves from UFO's?

A weapon like this?

Schumann said Monday's hypersonic weapon test is part of the Pentagon's Conventional Prompt Global Strike weapons technology development program. The program aims to develop and demonstrate promising weapons programs for potential uses on land and sea, she added.

Monday's Advanced Hypersonic Weapon test was overseen by the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command and Army Forces Strategic Command. The Army launched a successful test of the weapon in 2011 from the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Kauai, Hawaii.

That 2011 test sent the prototype weapon across the Pacific Ocean to the Army's Ronald Reagan Test Site on the Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. It traveled 2,500 miles in 30 minutes, according a U.S. Army statement released at the time.

Space.com article

However can't someone point out how strange it would be for advanced ET to come to Earth and do a technology exchange for us to just turn their technology back on to them?

Or maybe we have not back engineered any alien technology because UFO's have never made contact, and our defense against UFO's are all man-made weaponry? And is it possibly we have a space defense and never use it? Or do you think if we were attacking UFO's in our atmosphere or outside our atmosphere, the battles would go unnoticed by people?

It's tough to say. It's a fact the private space industry is growing, and weapons are becoming more advanced, but the dangers of space are not an attack from UFO's, but surviving in the zero-gravity, exposed radiation, isolation, and vacuum of space environment.

originally posted by: NotMoose
OK, the White House was sent a petition that asked them to acknowledge if they are covering up an extraterrestrial presence. They deny that they are covering up an extraterrestrial presence. Then they don't release statements on UFO's. Why would they admit that they were covering up extraterrestrial presence (just because of a petition)?
They just released a generic statement and went back to business as usual.

Exactly, very strange they don't mention UFO's. Do they still hold the same belief 5% of UFO sightings remain unknown and those UFO's pose no threat? Or have they changed their mind and see no reason to address UFO's because they think 100% of UFO sightings can be explained? Do we have too many problems on earth for the government to address UFO's? What would they say? I think they would attempt to debunk and deny all UFO sightings. So what is the official explanation nowadays?

In the past number of years I feel like the UFO phenomenon has been addressed by the media and by civilians. Often we hear x amount of the population now believes in intelligent life elsewhere in the Universe, and now x amount believe we have been visited. Do you think the official explanation of UFO's will fall to popular opinion and the Government will use that as their official answer? Why won't the government specifically address UFO sightings? What happened to the 5% that remains unknown and poses no threat?

I have a feeling this goes way beyond any civilian government.

Aero-Military/Interstellar government? Quite possible IMO.

originally posted by: NotMoose
OK, the White House was sent a petition that asked them to acknowledge if they are covering up an extraterrestrial presence. They deny that they are covering up an extraterrestrial presence. Then they don't release statements on UFO's. Why would they admit that they were covering up extraterrestrial presence (just because of a petition)?
They just released a generic statement and went back to business as usual.

They could of got 1 billion people to sign that petition, it still wouldn't stop the White House keeping their sheep uninformed.

a reply to: game over man

So do aliens travel to our planet and visit no one?

Do Aliens visit our planet ?

As all the government Area 51 type stories are not true?

Some are true but that doesn't necessarily mean Aliens.

About 95% can be identified, and the other 5% remain unknown, however pose no threat.

Three types of lies , lies , damn lies and statistics.

a reply to: game over man

"IF" There is any truth to Nuclear Missiles in their launch silos being shut down or going active irregardless of the actions of the crew... Then I no doubt believe some part of the government thinks them hostile... There is a new book coming out where 150 silo crew members were interviewed.. A web sight called www.ufohastings.com has all kinds of info on shut downs both for the USA and Russia..

About UFOs and Nuclear Weapons

Although most people are completely unaware of its existence, the UFO-Nukes Connection is now remarkably well-documented. U.S. Air Force, FBI, and CIA files declassified via the Freedom of Information Act establish a convincing, ongoing pattern of UFO activity at American nuclear weapons sites extending back to December 1948.

Moreover, these mysterious incursions are not ancient history, so to speak, occurring only during the Cold War era. Indeed, evidence suggests that multiple, ongoing incidents have taken place near ICBM sites operated by Malmstrom AFB, Montana, as recently as October 2012.

www.ufohastings.com...
WW3 is a big deal and even when the inhibit switches are thrown the missiles do not respond but stay in "Go" mode.. All it would take is one launch and we could probably kiss mankind goodbye or set those who remained back to a time when life expectancies were around 25 or less... Something like that.. Not Nice...

Since 1973, I have interviewed more than 140 U.S. military veterans regarding their knowledge of incidents involving UFO activity at nuclear weapons sites. Seven of those individuals participated in my September 27, 2010 “UFOs and Nukes” press conference, in Washington D.C., which CNN streamed live. The full-length video may be viewed at my website’s homepage.

The latest interview, with former U.S. Air Force Security Policeman Joseph C. Pscolka, Jr., occurred earlier this week.

www.ufohastings.com...

a reply to: game over man

It is a good lie...that the government has been promoting.

Many of us who have seen real UFO"s... and some too ...who have actually seen what the life forms look like who are on them...know they exist.

Do some people believe us? Yes. Do many not believe; that is true too; and those that don't believe or the prove to me people...well just because they haven't seen any UFO's nor the being on them...does not change the truth that many of us have.

I'd say it's true unless you know of some war of the world's invasion that the rest of us aren't privy to. It seems to me that if they exist at all, and I'm doubtful, that they have no interest in any kind of invasion or war. Obviously. Otherwise everyone would be aware of their existence and would know they are violent.
All we have are science fiction movies so far.

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
Or a third question that goes against the others...


There is UFOs, and some are a threat...

Really ? When and where did anything happen that you think that?

Oh come on now. What is that , The Galactic Federation fantasy flying around the net ?
Brought to us by the likes of Blossom Goodchild and Richard Boylan ?
Where is there any evidence of that?

reply to: AnuTyr

You're making an assumption here. UFO merely means unidentified flying object. It does not mean extraterrestrial.
There is no contradiction in their statement. It's obvious that nothing up there has posed a threat to mankind even if it is from off world. But their statement that the 5% they cannot identify poses no threat does not imply friendly or uninterested extraterrestrials. It means exactly what it says.

A reply to: game over man

If there was an alien threat, it would hit us with little to no warning pretty quickly. They wouldn't have to show up to position themselves over capitals like the movie "Independence Day" where it was dramatically strategic like it was a game of chess. They'd just hit us like it was a fist from God.

They could simply over power us with advanced weaponry and air to air superiority where it would be like that start of the "War on Terror", where the whole human race is the folks hiding in the caves and mountains, and they'd be the elite Americans. Sure we got some of, what we called advanced technology, but the common view of an alien spacecraft is that it can leave earth relatively easily, when our most advanced aircraft can have a difficult time to barely leave the atmosphere, not to mention the availability and the production to make such craft .

If aliens were a threat, it probably be to little to late, but seeing as to how cruel our evil over lords are wanting us to live, realizing that death is just the easy way out for us lower life forms.

So no, they are going to let us suffer to our own devices.

originally posted by: game over man

And the claim by the government, "About 95% can be identified, and the other 5% remain unknown, however pose no threat." Is a true statement?

Lots of claims by the government about the UFO subject (some of which are demonstrably incorrect) but the thread below goes into more detail about the true number of Bluebook's 'unexplained' reports and studies carried out for the U.S. Government by organisations like the Battelle Institute.


Official UFO Unexplained Report Percentages.


When it came to the findings of Bluebook Special Report 14 they concluded 'the better the quality of the sighting report, the more likely it was unexplainable'; that 'UNKNOWNS were observed for longer than KNOWNS' and that less than 2% of reports fell in the hoax category..

To be classed as an unknown, a UFO report also had to be "good," meaning that it had to come from a competent observer and had to contain a reasonable amount of data...

Apparently about 30 or 40 per cent of Bluebook cases may have been 'miscategorized' by the USAF as 'identified' and the true number of credible cases grossly underestimated -also, there were serious claims that the Bluebook team from the 1960's went back and substituted official summary cards for unexplained cases 'to reduce the number of unknowns at any cost' so when it comes to the actual stats they all may be a bit fudged.

As for UFOs not posing a threat, cases like this one, this one, this one and this one raise very serious questions about aviation safety and I wouldn´t have liked to be in the aircraft at the time.

Cheers.

With all their technology they still crash apparently. Or maybe they run out if gas. a reply to: Specimen

a reply to: AutumnWitch657

I merely pointed to an alternative question.


But how about those abductions...
I guess they're malevolent visits.

a reply to: karl 12

When it came to the findings of Bluebook Special Report 14 they concluded 'the better the quality of the sighting report, the more likely it was unexplainable'; that 'UNKNOWNS were observed for longer than KNOWNS' and that less than 2% of reports fell in the hoax category..

I don't think that was a "conclusion" but it was shown to be the case. I'm not sure how to interpret that. What do you think the significance of that would be?