Ferguson Grand Jury: No Indictment for Darren Wilson in Michael Brown Shooting

originally posted by: jhn7537
The community is full of sh*t...



If they wanted to honor Michael Brown's death, they would have respected the wishes of the parents...



These people are opportunistic. They saw a chance to earn a quick buck by looting stores, they knew the likelihood of being caught was small, so they jumped on the opportunity..

They did respect the wishes of the parents. They changed their tune when there was no indictment and they didn't get their way. They wanted Ferguson to burn.

Michael Brown's Stepfather Urged Protesters To "Burn This Bitch Down" After Grand Jury Announcement
www.thesmokinggun.com...

a reply to: XxNightAngelusxX

There was plenty enough evidence to prove this one cop did not act out of line. Please stop acting like there simply wasn't enough evidence to charge him with a crime, there was no crime.

originally posted by: jhn7537
It's sad that people only respect due process when it works in their favor... Can't have it both ways people...

thats the name of the game

much like browns family calling for a peaceful protest....

that lasted till not even 90 seconds after the decision was announced and browns dad starting shouting at the crowd to burn it down...

they wanted it peaceful till they didnt get what they wanted....same deal

So now what? 120 protests just for today, now what are we gonna do?

originally posted by: jimmyx

you must think all young black men are criminals or have criminal records then, that would be the logical conclusion you seemed to have reached.

Nope, just one out of every three... fact.

originally posted by: Grovit


i think we all have an issue with the way the media has handled this...
that said, just like a lot of us are saying the protestors and looters need to take responsibility, so does the average citizen.
there are more sources for information out there than the big few like cnn and fox.

The big few as you put it are invested in the divide. They are happy to support a continued narrative that keeps hate in place.

an example: on the ground "reporter" for CNN = Van Jones.

originally posted by: jimmyx

is it illegal for black people in Missouri to obtain CCP's?

Not at all. But the county can ban/restrict the open carrying of firearms (which in the case of St. Louis County is what happened)

Open Carry Map of STL County

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: stosh64

originally posted by: jimmyx


I wonder how it would have gone down in Ferguson, if 20 to 30 young black guys wearing camos, and legally carrying AR's

That LEGALLY thing would have been the tough part I bet.

Considering the fact that open carry in Ferguson is only legal with a valid concealed weapons permit... it would have ended with all of them in jail.

is it illegal for black people in Missouri to obtain CCP's?

A) Good luck finding 20 to 30 young black guys in the city of Ferguson who have a concealed weapons permit. Not racism, just facts. Minorities make up a very small percentage of permit holders in every state.

B) If you can find 20 to 30 young black guys in the city of Ferguson who have a concealed weapons permit, they won't be stupid enough to put themselves in the middle of that chaos... ESPECIALLY while open-carrying a rifle.

Your imaginary scenario isn't logical so don't use it to start a racial argument.

a reply to: jhn7537

Justice is only justice when it's your own personal flavor of Justice.

The Justice of the "system" isn't Justice.

At least, that's how they probably think.

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: stosh64

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: macman

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: macman
a reply to: stosh64

Another Race Pimp arrives on scene.

Well, I bet Ferguson is grateful he is there. Maybe he was delayed due to some tax issues he hasn't resolved yet.

"race pimp"?....don't be shy, tell us what you really think.

Well, how about tax evader?
Instigator?
Race profiteer?
Liar?
POS?

That should do for now.

I wonder how it would have gone down in Ferguson, if 20 to 30 young black guys wearing camos, and legally carrying AR's

That LEGALLY thing would have been the tough part I bet.

why would that be tough?... you must think all young black men are criminals or have criminal records then, that would be the logical conclusion you seemed to have reached.

Again, don't take your idiotic imaginary scenario and make it into a racial argument. Some of us like to use facts and you'll lose this one.

originally posted by: howmuch4another


The big few as you put it are invested in the divide. They are happy to support a continued narrative that keeps hate in place.

an example: on the ground "reporter" for CNN = Van Jones.

im aware of that.
the big few are not the only places to get the news.
it sucks the media reports the way they do but people have loads of resources at their finger tips to search out a different source.

originally posted by: jjkenobi
Justice has been done in Ferguson. But the people aren't interested in justice. They just want a lynching.

or...they just want the police to stop shooting and killing unarmed black people...that would be a start....but, that's the part that gets lost in this, and no one in the media or government has the balls to come out and say it....
questions that could have been answered in a trial....if the officer feared for his life, because of the size and thuggish behavior of Brown, why did he have his window down, when Brown approached his car?.....and if the officer couldn't get Brown to obey his command to get out of the street, why didn't he just call for backup and simply keep driving, and follow brown who was walking, until the backup arrived?....and how did the officer get hit on the "passenger" right side of his face while in the car?....

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: deadeyedick

there is a clear picture here but youu have to breathe to see it.

There is a clear picture but you're apparently not willing to see it.





How is it that if the grand jury decided to indict Officer Wilson, they were doing the right thing but because they didn't, there was some sort of conspiracy to manipulate their opinions?



The justice system is only working when it gives the answer you want to hear, is that it? Luckily, public opinion spurred on by the blood-sucking media is not what determines a person's guilt or innocence in this country.

the answer is quite simple. an indictment is not a conviction. there was reasonable doubt and all could have been cleared up through the justice system. the officer should not have engauged the suspect alone being that the officer was injured already. i would not be saying this if he had killied the suspect at the car. he chased him firing at his back and forced the situation further. the truth may be that he was charged or that he made the suspect come near him but the angle of the kill shot shows the suspect was going down. the height difference proves this. this should be in court because most places this is not procedure. i am all for justice but this was dirty harry at work. those days should be behind us. there was probable cause for a trial for the lesser charges.

we would be lieing to ourselves if we do not see that this whole event after the shooting was staged and timed to get the result we got. stores purposefully left unboarded to be looted. all the calls for unrest by black leaders. we are being herded. the media making it sound like he was killed near the police car. it is funny how the protesters knew their was a 90 sec. chase but the media made it sound as if it all happened at the first scene. they even stated that when shot mike was charging toward the car.

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: XxNightAngelusxX
With lacking evidence, *they* must have known it would wind up like this. The chaos last night was ridiculous. I honestly fear for our species if we resort to shooting random people and lighting random buildings on fire When a single cop acts out of line.

So, please enlighten me as to how the 'cop acts out of line'. Was because he assaulted another LEO and tried to grab his gun? Or how the cop assaulted a store owner and stole cigars?

Uh... Because he shot an unarmed man?

There's speculation about weather or not he was charging the cop, but from what I understand, he WAS unarmed. I don't know if it was racially motivated or not, and I don't care. I'm not going to act like I know all the details, but to imply he didn't act out of line at all...? Come on.

I don't care that he's off scottfree. It doesn't matter at all compared to the impact of the media and the riots going on.

I think the guy shot in Walmart for holding a bb gun is more riot worthy, not that I'm endorsing riots... But wait, I forgot. If the incident isn't painted up as racist, it doesn't matter.

Man Shot In Walmart For Holding Bb Gun

originally posted by: Bone75
a reply to: XxNightAngelusxX

There was plenty enough evidence to prove this one cop did not act out of line. Please stop acting like there simply wasn't enough evidence to charge him with a crime, there was no crime.

Sorry, I wasn't aware that you had all the details that the rest of us are lacking. You must have been there and witnessed it.. How else could you know?

Weather or not he's guilty was nowhere NEAR my point. And frankly, I don't care if he was or not. His life is ruined one way or another, and there are fires and gunshots engulfing that town. That, in my book, is more important.

originally posted by: jimmyx
they just want the police to stop shooting and killing unarmed black people...that would be a start.

Amazing how a simple phrase can be so misleading.

People who engage in violent behavior and show a willingness to hurt, maim, or kill people will not be tolerated. Armed, unarmed, white, black, brown, male, female... it doesn't matter.

If you attack a police officer and go for his sidearm, you will be justifiably shot. Once you've proven that you're willing to go for his sidearm and you continue to attack, you will be justifiably shot some more. This whole case really boils down to that.

a reply to: jimmyx

And I am sure that as a whole, LE and the public would LOVE it if young blacks stopped attacking police officers.


Your flavor of BS still stinks.

a reply to: Answer

But.........................it was an unarmed black male......don't you see the issue????

originally posted by: deadeyedick

originally posted by: Answer

originally posted by: deadeyedick

there is a clear picture here but youu have to breathe to see it.

There is a clear picture but you're apparently not willing to see it.





How is it that if the grand jury decided to indict Officer Wilson, they were doing the right thing but because they didn't, there was some sort of conspiracy to manipulate their opinions?



The justice system is only working when it gives the answer you want to hear, is that it? Luckily, public opinion spurred on by the blood-sucking media is not what determines a person's guilt or innocence in this country.

the answer is quite simple. an indictment is not a conviction. there was reasonable doubt and all could have been cleared up through the justice system.

Clearly there wasn't reasonable doubt. The only reasonable doubt has been drummed up by the media and you bought right into it.

The justice system worked the way it's supposed to work.

a reply to: deadeyedick

Except the autospy indicates he was shot from the front of the body, not the back.