It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: peck420
originally posted by: tadaman
The only thing that has been proven to work is allowing people to keep what they earn. There is less money for social programs but all things considered, if we could keep what we earn we would not need social assistance.
No taxation theorem, including an absence of taxation, has been proven to work.
Every single theorem has had successes and failures.
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: peck420
I disagree.
Wealth doesnt grow for a country under higher taxation.
If the middle class wasnt the real target of all this I would think like you guys. Since this is not about a 1% who are in many cases not even citizens but international investors, and if it wasnt really about about people making around 100K...which is the middle class, I refuse to entertain moral arguments as if they were founded in logic.
originally posted by: jimmyx
true, but the current system cannot be sustained. the wealthy have an advantage that no other income group enjoys as far as the accumulation....we cannot continue to reward the top .01% of the wealthy, with less of a percentage of taxes paid.
originally posted by: tadaman
If you are talking about France or other places with high taxes you would be talking about life style.
I will not work 20 hour days or 6 month stretches with no days off to live like a European. I will do it to live and retire like an American and for my children to be able to do so if they choose.... And that is both morally valid and socially acceptable, regardless of what you or others think. I have the natural freedom to get what I work /fight for.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: Iamschist
I'm a 10%er. Ten percent across the board, no deductions, no exceptions. The rich would of course contribute more, due to the huge amount they have in assets. The more you profit, the more you pay, but never more than 10%. Seems fair and equatable to me and would increase tax revenue considerably.
agreed this is best. That way you still can have the American dream of becoming rich and you won't get it all taken away from you. What's the point of trying to get ahead in life if you get it all taxed from you? 10% for everyone...every corporation...everything. Then we start gutting the government. Starting with all of our secret spy agencies and alphabet agencies..and our military bases in foreign lands. Now we're getting somewhere! Oh.. but that makes too much sense! LOL
Since when is the, so-called, 'American Dream' about becoming rich. It was about opportunity and the dream of owning your own modest home, a good 'tax paid' education for your children so that they could do the same. The dream you are taking about is the 'nightmare' we are living in.
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
imho The 10% flat tax is the millionaires dream, fair really?
Or just another attempt to lower their taxes?
Lifes not fair so-
Tax the rich, they will not go hungry!
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
I'm referring to fairness. It is not fair, regardless of the situation to tax you at 20% and tax me at 10%. A percentage is always fair.
AlaskanDad
"life's not fair" another bit of sarcasm for those that like to point this out so often when the hardships of the poor are discussed.
originally posted by: tadaman
originally posted by: Meee32
It's just a rediculous non-sensical statement, the truth is the rich pay little or no tax at all for practically anything. They have fancy lawyers and accountants that find every loophole there is. 98 of the ftse 100 pays no tax... Nada...
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
First do you have anything to back your claim that "Well there still like 80% of America that work for the small business owner."?
While you say you will not shop at walmart, yet you oppose the Waltons paying a 90% tax? interesting
originally posted by: tadaman
Most Europeans live in smaller homes with the exception of northern countries.
Most Europeans dont own more than one home or car.
Most Europeans dont travel the way Americans do or in the same luxury.
Most middle class Europeans live month to month as compared to middle class Americans who can save or invest like upper middle class Europeans.
Most Europeans dont own any property beyond their homes....if they own them at all....
Most Europeans rely on social assistance they pay into all their lives.
originally posted by: tadaman
If it was such an affordable life style, then Europe wouldnt be ablaze with protests and near riots over austerity.
originally posted by: tadaman
I dont see that in the US.
originally posted by: tadaman
I have actually lived in Europe. Have you?