Study Says Sandy Hook Killer Carefully Planned Attack

There are a few juicy bits in this article. The juiciest bit is that the alleged killer, Adam Lanza weighed a measly 112 pounds at the time of his death. He was a 6 foot tall walking skeleton and he carried off this attack?

These are the things that make me wonder about Sandy Hook. He was obviously VERY malnourished, down right cachectic! The article goes on to mention a "study" that found he planned the attack for a long time, and some other info.

You can find it here.

How physically fit does one need to be to go in to a school and shoot children?

Wouldn't it be move if the government released information publicly so we could see we can question them? It's hard to believe any of these kinds of studies. I know kids exactly like the portrait of Adam Lanza and most direct their destruction at themselves not others. I would love to see what they are basing his "obsession with mass murders on".

Im sure the real killer did. Whether or not that is Adam Lanza is still yet to be determined.

originally posted by: Shamrock6
How physically fit does one need to be to go in to a school and shoot children?

apparently very.
if he would have been shredded they would have said roid rage

anyone know where adam lanza is now?

i know next to nothing about this story/ct...
is he dead?
is he in jail an if so where?

i just looked on wiki and it didnt say anything

Too bad the official account of the event was as detailed as this report.

Second

of course the killer carefully planned the attack, lets face it, the. C.I.A is pretty good at their job.

originally posted by: Grovit
anyone know where adam lanza is now?

i know next to nothing about this story/ct...
is he dead?
is he in jail an if so where?

i just looked on wiki and it didnt say anything

He killed himself before cops arrived, or so they say. One would think that a guy who was obsessed with being a mass killer would have kept going until they killed him.

The only case of one of these shootings where the shooter didn't kill himself, that I know of, was Aurora. Most likely there were too many witnesses for them to execute him so he couldn't talk.

originally posted by: tavi45


He killed himself before cops arrived, or so they say. One would think that a guy who was obsessed with being a mass killer would have kept going until they killed him.

Didn't the cops execute him? I read somewhere that he was shot in the back of the head, either by the cops or by his accomplice who got away or somebody. There was a thread on this site a while ago saying he was murdered.

a reply to: muchmadness

This is just one the many ideas of what 'really' happened to him.
The official narrative is that he offed him self

originally posted by: muchmadness

originally posted by: tavi45


He killed himself before cops arrived, or so they say. One would think that a guy who was obsessed with being a mass killer would have kept going until they killed him.

Didn't the cops execute him? I read somewhere that he was shot in the back of the head, either by the cops or by his accomplice who got away or somebody. There was a thread on this site a while ago saying he was murdered.

The official narrative is that he killed himself

Within minutes, he killed the children, six adults and himself.

m.huffpost.com...

In my opinion, the entire thing was a giant false flag. There was far too much coordination and media control of the situation for something that was apparently so random. So he most likely was executed to cover things up.

I'm actually amazed at how few people here give any credence to the conspiracy theories. There was an absolutely amazing amount of covering up of evidence and control of the situation. To me it absolutely reeked of being a false flag operation.

Just read the whole thing. I wonder if the rest of his e-mail's are out there.

Anyway, this whole study goes pretty in-depth. It makes a lot more sense than a lot of the conspiracies I've read about it.

Did they ever figure out what the note/envelope said that was on Mrs. Lanza's bedside table, or was it irrelevant?

originally posted by: Shamrock6
How physically fit does one need to be to go in to a school and shoot children?

As a nurse, at 6 feet tall and only weighing 112 pounds I would wager that Lanza was extremely malnourished, making it rather difficult for him to carry out the shootings.

Was it impossible? Nothing is impossible, but difficult? Yes.

originally posted by: muchmadness

originally posted by: tavi45


He killed himself before cops arrived, or so they say. One would think that a guy who was obsessed with being a mass killer would have kept going until they killed him.

Didn't the cops execute him? I read somewhere that he was shot in the back of the head, either by the cops or by his accomplice who got away or somebody. There was a thread on this site a while ago saying he was murdered.

I've always wondered if he had an accomplice and I also wonder who he was corresponding with in those emails. I bet we never hear any more a out those.

The whole thing is just SO weird, I honestly don't like reading about it, to tell you the truth.

a reply to: Shamrock6

i'm sure this thread will get shut down soon-ish, but what the hell...

according to everything we're told, he was carrying quite a lot of weight, in weapons, ammo, etc....i've seen, i believe on this very site, people who could be considered experts on the subject, say that the kind of load he was said to have been lugging around would be similar to what a soldier would be carrying..and a soldier is gonna be in way better physical shape than this funny looking little skeleton man, whom they keep telling us did this..

a reply to: muchmadness

his recorded cause of death is a self-inflicted GSW.....problem is, there are conflicting reports about the location of that fatal wound. one report has him putting the gun in his mouth(intra-oral GSW), while another has him contorting himself into a most unnatural shape, and shooting himself in the back of the head(BOOM! HEADSHOT!).

a reply to: Daedalus

I'm just curious, and this is in no way at all directed at you personally but more of a general question.....why is it that so many on here are willing to accept one set of "facts" (ie, an article talking about his weight and physical health, etc) but at the same time don't accept other "facts" (ie he did it)? It frankly boggles my mind how quickly and easily some people can utterly dismiss one set of information and substitute an entirely new one that is theoretically just as dubious.

In any event, as to your comment, I hadn't seen anything at all about how much weight he was supposed to be carrying, so that's news to me. Thanks for the info, I'll have to look around for it.