It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Sabiduria
Russia doesn't have but the one carrier. If they're planning on long term deployments to the Gulf of Mexico they have to have a land base in either Cuba or Venezuela to do it.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Sabiduria
Russia doesn't have but the one carrier. If they're planning on long term deployments to the Gulf of Mexico they have to have a land base in either Cuba or Venezuela to do it.
originally posted by: jinni73
a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne
And cuba is just what you know about,
the Russians came to Australia with two of their nuclear submarines in order to destroy the radars that monitor asia at a different location to where people think they are at pine gap.
and the Aussies told them they would destroy their subs one minute before the Russians launched their nukes the Russians got a phone call one minute before and the russians went home with their tail between their legs.
If the Russians start a war it is because they are working with the Illuminati not against.
They tell us the military protect our country this is utter BS as they let these illuminati gutless spineless cowards run our world and do nothing about taking them out
abcnews.go.com...
Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman, declined to call this a Russian provocation. He said the Russians have a right, like any other nation, to operate in international airspace and in international waters. The important thing, Warren said, is for such exercises to be carried out safely and in accordance with international standards.
originally posted by: truttseeker
China has one carrier. If they both allied it wouldn't matter. No one wins that war.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: SonOfTheLawOfOne
well obama sure ant the president Kennedy was.
we might as well kiss our a@@'s goodbye.
Frank Kendall, the Pentagon’s chief weapons buyer, told lawmakers that when it comes to “technological superiority, the Department of Defense is being challenged in ways that I have not seen for decades, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region.”
Citing China’s major investments in anti-ship missiles, stealth fighter jets, hypersonic vehicles and other hi-tech weaponry, Kendall said the United States could lose its dominant position if it failed to respond to the altered strategic landscape.
“Technological superiority is not assured and we cannot be complacent about our posture,” he told the House Armed Services Committee.