It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
All of them are baseless.
only half my claims are baseless because i have no testing equipment
originally posted by: frayed1
originally posted by: deadeyedick
.... Witches do not like it ....
?? I'm curious,...... How did you arrive at this statement?.......As witches often 'recommend' being 'sky clad' for outdoor rituals, and are more generally 'nature oriented' , it would seem they would be more likely, quite fond of this type of 'untouched' rainfall ....and more able than others to capture some of it......or do they have to keep their brooms parked during inclement weather?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick
Try what?
Dumping ungrounded rain on a witch? Would she melt? Is that what happened to wicked witch of the west?
only half wrong because i have seen it break negative bonds.
originally posted by: eisegesis
a reply to: deadeyedick
If you put it in skunk works then you yourself have to realize it might not be real. Skunk works isn't the forum to prove the existence of anything, it's to speculate and discuss possibilities. Are you open to the possibility you might be wrong?
originally posted by: deadeyedick
only half wrong because i have seen it break negative bonds.
originally posted by: Rainbowresidue
a reply to: deadeyedick
Yes, of course rain coming from the sky is clean and pure.
So is drinking water from the Alps.
( I lived in Austria for 6 years, you should taste their spring water, it tastes like heaven and candy.)
Why are you talking about this?
I don't drink tap water, I buy it, from a source I know that is clean.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
only half wrong because i have seen it break negative bonds.
originally posted by: eisegesis
a reply to: deadeyedick
If you put it in skunk works then you yourself have to realize it might not be real. Skunk works isn't the forum to prove the existence of anything, it's to speculate and discuss possibilities. Are you open to the possibility you might be wrong?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick
Ah. You didn't mention "negative" witches in your OP.
The Wizard of Oz is not a myth or a legend.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick
Ah. You didn't mention "negative" witches in your OP.
The Wizard of Oz is not a myth or a legend.
originally posted by: eisegesis
originally posted by: deadeyedick
only half wrong because i have seen it break negative bonds.
originally posted by: eisegesis
a reply to: deadeyedick
If you put it in skunk works then you yourself have to realize it might not be real. Skunk works isn't the forum to prove the existence of anything, it's to speculate and discuss possibilities. Are you open to the possibility you might be wrong?
If one point is half wrong then it's wrong. Two points that are half wrong means either one is right or both are wrong again.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: AgentShillington
What does this even mean?
Derp. Go out in the rain and stick your tongue out.
If I read the O.P correctly, that wouldn't suffice as you would be grounded. So you would need to jump in the air and stick your tongue out, whilst it is raining.
prove it
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick
Try what?
Dumping ungrounded rain on a witch? Would she melt? Is that what happened to wicked witch of the west?
All of them are baseless.
only half my claims are baseless because i have no testing equipment
Just saying, but yes, The wizard of Oz was a movie, nevertheless, they used the right 'weapon' imo to destroy the evil witch.