a reply to:
TrueBrit
Again.... That is the art of someone who is rather sick. Like I was saying the people who do much more sick # when these people are alive are in a
different light.
At least this man isn't doing it to* the living. That is why the law officers saw nothing wrong. There is nothing else this man can be charged for
other than desecration of a grave site. And with the article being so vague... was this person taking valuables to pawn shops? Was he making a living
off of the corpses? Was this his income? Did he defile the corpses with semen? You can see why police didn't really do much because it is almost like
dealing with a panhandler. This is a HUGE grey area for many people.
For example I like to write out fake murder diaries in my spare time. Especially when I get overly angry. Instead of actively going out and killing
someone, I write up a bunch of ways I would go about killing. The funny part of my writings is how they started out vague. But became much more
detailed as each entry I made revealed more in this fantasy. Completely made up in a world where it started out barren with the focus on the first
person I fantasized about killing. I never put a name to the person. Instead I acted it out in my fantasy world on a random person in this made up
universe. What first started out in a void slowly became a fake city within my own mind. I very much would love to kill someone some day, but I don't.
Almost like the Movie Sin City 2: A dame to kill for, the main character likes looking for an excuse to hurt somebody. That is how I crafted this city
within my own mind. However there is no safe zone for the criminals. In my fantasy the police are getting better and better at picking up on clues. So
within my own mind I create the diversions. I get more crafty with each kill. I don't make them look like accidents. Instead I take a great deal of
making each murder vary vastly from the previous. But this is all fantasy. I don't really share it with the world. I just keep it on my hard drive.
Even talking about it in this very thread is dangerous. But I am already seeing a psychiatrist weekly. And he knows what I am up to.
I have been taken downtown by one of the other psychiatrists because she truly believed I was a danger to myself and others. The officer also felt
that same vibe about me. But the professional I met with, after sitting alone in a room for 3 hours, discharged me with nothing more than mood
disorders.
So let's apply my train of thought to this.
-This man obviously has an odd obsession with the dead.
--Particularly dead children.
-He dresses them up in different clothes and creates a character based on what he thinks would be their lifestyle.
--He continuously wrote out each of his attempts to preserve these bodies.
--Until he crafted a more profound way of keeping that image in their faces, and the overall condition of the body to remain in a state that would
never decay.
(Of which even Egyptians would want to learn from this if they still held these values for the ones in the afterlife.)
*He has a new found passion.
-I would bet that he tried talking to families and got responses from them that mirrors everyone's post in here.
--Probably tried to open up a shop for people who would want this for their children.
-->Found out there is no market for it.
---1 Going out to morgues and trying to reach out would have been another option.
---2 Maybe he was hired onto a mortuary at one point and got a little bit too involved with making them out how he saw them.
---2* Found out he received bad reception from the people who wanted them to look like something they wanted, other than the work of art he put
together.
(This is usually the case.... As a final farewell family members sometimes want their bodies to be dressed up in a way that they remembered them. They
want it to be as close as picture perfect, of how they remember them, as possible. So most of the time the people at the mortuary just follow orders.
I would say this is pretty sad... No individuality for the dead.)
---2# Maybe they never hired him on in the first place.
---- Maybe he tried using mannequins at one point but felt that the lifeless expressions they had, along with their picture perfect symmetrical look,
just didn't seem authentic enough to him.
---->Almost as if he was searching for a bigger challenge.
So.... because he seems to be evergreen to the idea.... he has to fill it. And did so for several years.
Which is why I hate the article being so closed minded itself without exploring every possible corner.
And the responses I am reading in here just further proves the way of his thinking.
edit on 10252014 by GiulXainx because: Among to To.
Second paragraph first sentence.