It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The state’s only interest in marriage rites, he argued, is economic.
“First,” he wrote, “Texas’s marriage laws are rationally related to the State’s interest in encouraging couples to produce new offspring, which are needed to ensure economic growth and the survival of the human race.”
“Second, Texas’s marriage laws are rationally related to the State’s interest in reducing unplanned out-of-wedlock births. By channeling procreative heterosexual intercourse into marriage, Texas’s marriage laws reduce unplanned out-of-wedlock births and the costs that those births impose on society.”
originally posted by: mOjOm
So, back to my original point. Have certain Politicians become completely Mentally Damaged over this whole Topic??? Personally, I'll listen to anyone's argument either for or against something as long as the argument, at the very least, is logically consistent. But if the argument being presented doesn't even make any sense to begin with, there is nothing to discuss. It would be like debating weather or not Unicorns eat a healthier diet than average Horses. It's just silly and when Elected Officials make such arguments publicly they should be called on it, rather than having the media try and sell it as if it's an actual topic to be discussed. It's just stupid and a waste of time.
Source
" The state's Republican governor, C.L. "Butch" Otter, said the move to allow gay marriage ran "contrary to the values of most Idahoans" and undermined fundamental states' rights.
"But we are a nation of laws," Otter said in a statement. "Idaho now should proceed with civility and in an orderly manner to comply with any forthcoming order from the 9th Circuit."
originally posted by: Bone75
My problem isn't with gay marriage in and of itself, people should be free to marry whoever they want. My problem is how the issue is being used as a weapon to tear down Christianity.
Rather than losing their minds trying to stop gay marriage altogether, these politicians should be focusing on putting protections in place for churches and businesses that don't want to participate.
originally posted by: Bone75
Rather than losing their minds trying to stop gay marriage altogether, these politicians should be focusing on putting protections in place for churches and businesses that don't want to participate.
originally posted by: Bone75
My problem is how the issue is being used as a weapon to tear down Christianity.
Of course, the notion that your neighbors should be denied rights in order to impart your values on your own children would be a double-edged sword, if taken seriously. What if an atheist couple claimed their neighbors should be denied the right to go to church in order to prevent atheist children from getting ideas.
But watching all this go down was another reminder that anti-gay activists are, in a lot of ways, their own worst enemies. They’re so afraid of being called “bigots” that they refuse to make their arguments openly, instead just gesturing at them and hoping people get the hint. The problem with arguing by implication, however, is people have to know what you’re implying. But the real argument for why same-sex marriage supposedly hurts straight marriage is so rarely uttered that people legitimately forget what the argument was. The argument is that by allowing gay people to get married, you “degrade” the institution of marriage and straight people won’t want it anymore because gay people ruined it, merely by existing.
Obviously, that argument relies on bigotry. It’s an argument in favor of segregation, similar to the arguments made in favor of excluding black people from schools and neighborhoods. It so quickly marks the person arguing it as a bigot that it’s understandable that anti-gay activists are wary of making it directly, and instead are reduced to shrugging in its general direction. But they’ve been shrugging so long and are so afraid to make the argument that people forgot what their argument was in the first place.
It’s like running out in the street and saying, “What do we want? An end to sunshine! Why do we want it? Purple!”
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
I really doubt you will find many insane positions coming from the left. If we were to carry through with your plan to fill the thread up with idiot politicians sticking their foot in their mouths about gay marriage, I think you will mostly find right wing people doing it. I say this as a Libertarian too. There really is no justifiable reason to not let gay people marry.
15b.) Profanity: You will not use profanity in our forums on the Websites, and will neither Post with language or content that is obscene, sexually oriented, or sexually suggestive nor link to sites that contain such content. You will also not use common alternative spellings or net-speak alternative for profane words.
originally posted by: Lyxdeslic
I'm still having a hard time wrapping my mind around why it matters what two consenting adults do.
This is America. You're free to do whatever you want here unless it harms another individual.
Two consenting adults of the same gender having sex/getting married does not harm you.
It's sad because I'm sure the male politicians who are 'against gay marriage' probably jack off into their sock over lesbian porn.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
Can you give specifics? How does gay people getting married affect Christianity at all?