It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the face of Western air superiority I would like to now how they accomplish that. Unless they have figured out how to move their tanks underground…
Has anyone stopped to wonder why they haven't threatened a single pipeline in Iraq? Remember when Saddam left little Kuwait? He set the oil fields on fire. If this ISIS is so threatening, wheres the smoke?
The smoke screen is being generated by the media.
After all this newest round of fear bombing is done, the only mission will be ongoing strikes in Syria.
"Assad must go"
Why would the West need regime change in Iraq
I think ISIS is a myth,a creation of the media and the elites to justify wars and regime changes in the ME region
Now that's some funny # right there! They must be holding cactus over their heads to fool the drones. Oh wait, I get it, we zigged and they zagged. We bomb Syria while they march on Bagdahd......Napoleon would have been so proud.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: daaskapital
Baghdad huh? So the battle for it begins.
And with our largest embassy this world has ever seen under direct threat expect boots on the ground, or should I say, more boots on the ground.
And the war machine keeps grinding away in the Middle East...
originally posted by: Agit8dChop
Iraq's seemed so able to strike the US with IED's, ambushes and guerrilla tactics in the Iraq war from 03-08
yet, seem so helpless in the face of a much less advanced enemy, ISIS1
It's almost as if they dont want to fight ISIS
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: Xtrozero
I'm thinking Ghengis khan style takeover. Capitulate or get massacred and then the next city is even easier.
They won't even need to fight they just kill everyone's kids and rape and kill and capitulate.