It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: schadenfreude
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: grainofsand
Ehh they pick and choose what they want to follow. The Christian religious book is chock full of contradictions. Thats why it is such a go to when they are faced with a dilemma because no matter what it is they want to believe they can find a passage somewhere within it to justify their actions of course they ignore the parts that disagree with them.
It is a conundrum for sure.
One of the most "commonly accepted lies" on the net & frankly I'm sick of hearing it.
Isn't the Bible full of contradictions?
For every website you can copy & paste the "contradictions" I can equally do the same from the other POV.
So now who is being disingenuous?
A monument to unbelief erected on public land
Guidelines for privately funded public monuments on the Bradford County Courthouse lawn require that the monuments commemorate “people, events and ideas which played a significant role in the development, origins or foundations of United States of America or Florida law or Bradford County.” Both the Ten Commandments and the atheist monument meet those requirements, Sexton said.
The atheist monument—which looks like a backward letter h—is engraved with the words of several Founding Fathers, as well as a quotation from the Treaty of Tripoli, signed by President John Adams in 1797. It reads, “The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion.”
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
originally posted by: jonnywhite
originally posted by: Char-Lee
a reply to: Grimpachi
Ehh they pick and choose what they want to follow.
Clearly everyone in every walk of life is doing just this on every subject all the time.
That is called freedom. I reject and I decide to accept by my will alone. No one should be bother by this.
Amen, and the Why of thigns is so difficult to answer and yet so profound. Science seeks the How, but its answers are limited in scope and only pertain to How.
Never thought of it that way, but I find that above quite elegantly spoken. Well done
if religion says the Earth emerged 6000 years ago and science says that's impossible then science has the upper hand.
Or simply not the right dictionary or the elemental counting skills needed. Here's a fun one. God creates everything in six similar periods of time called a day. The mantra is that one day for God is 1000 years for regular bleeders. Now, according to the Bible Adam was made on the sixth day and according to Genesis and royal Sumerian genealogies Adam was born around 6000 years ago. Now, this tells us not only that a day is something other than merely a 24hr period of various lighting conditions, but that God stayed on Earth when he did these things and Adam was created in the sixth of these cycles:
==> 6000 x 365 x 6000 = 13 140 000 000 years.
I'd say that is pretty close to what science says. Don't you? And it was written like that a few centuries BC. Quite amazing.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: ParasuvO
I figured out a long time go we know so very little about just about everything
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Char-Lee
Could you clarify your position on religious items on public property again? I assumed posts such as this meant you wanted them gone.
No problem. As I have already stated I am fine with the supreme court's rulings on religious monuments on historical buildings.
My question throughout the thread has been why do religionists feel the need to place religious monuments on public lands. It should be easy to recognize that question refers to ongoing attempts at tagging public lands.
I have asked that question several times but no one has answered.
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: Murgatroid
So absolute is not truth, it is a state of nothingness, which is only true to itself.
Just bumping in to defend Murgatroid here, not something I often do btw, Old Hermes Trismegistus would beg to differ, not just Jesus and Plato. Dealing with the truth is one of the most lethal things you can do. It's like sticking your head out of a train. It's all about timing really. And knowing your way around sarcasm and irony can literally save your life.
Meaningless entirely, every part of it is using logic that is unable to see any farther than it is allowed too.
Exqueeze me, but that's sodding nonsense, not all truth is self-evident. In fact, very little of what can be called Truth is is in any way self evident. Only a very few words in the dictionary are onomatopoetika, and yet, you will have to understand profound codes and cyphers called language in spoken and written form to get the full understanding of it.
originally posted by: Char-Lee
a reply to: Grimpachi
So the judges have agreed pretty much with you, they have not allowed newer displays. So i guess your quibble is that people keep trying to place them
A monument to unbelief erected on public land
Just reading this interesting case.
www.christiancentury.org...
Guidelines for privately funded public monuments on the Bradford County Courthouse lawn require that the monuments commemorate “people, events and ideas which played a significant role in the development, origins or foundations of United States of America or Florida law or Bradford County.” Both the Ten Commandments and the atheist monument meet those requirements, Sexton said.
The atheist monument—which looks like a backward letter h—is engraved with the words of several Founding Fathers, as well as a quotation from the Treaty of Tripoli, signed by President John Adams in 1797. It reads, “The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion.”
Personally I see it as Caesars area and personally don't feel the fight is worth it. If we gain equality for all it would require satanist groups and many other to clutter every area of public land. I do find it strange how we many times are not allowed a Christmas display on private property and even the flag itself is not allowed in many areas. I think private property would be the place for the displays as long as it was not something breaking local decency laws if in sight of public.
originally posted by: grainofsand
originally posted by: Char-Lee
a reply to: Grimpachi
If we gain equality for all it would require satanist groups and many other to clutter every area of public land.
That is the nature of equality. Do you support equality for all, or just Christian majority views?
1 But realize this, that in the last days difficult times will come. 2 For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, revilers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self-control, brutal, haters of good,
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
originally posted by: jonnywhite
originally posted by: Char-Lee
a reply to: Grimpachi
Ehh they pick and choose what they want to follow.
Clearly everyone in every walk of life is doing just this on every subject all the time.
That is called freedom. I reject and I decide to accept by my will alone. No one should be bother by this.
Amen, and the Why of thigns is so difficult to answer and yet so profound. Science seeks the How, but its answers are limited in scope and only pertain to How.
Never thought of it that way, but I find that above quite elegantly spoken. Well done
if religion says the Earth emerged 6000 years ago and science says that's impossible then science has the upper hand.
Or simply not the right dictionary or the elemental counting skills needed. Here's a fun one. God creates everything in six similar periods of time called a day. The mantra is that one day for God is 1000 years for regular bleeders. Now, according to the Bible Adam was made on the sixth day and according to Genesis and royal Sumerian genealogies Adam was born around 6000 years ago. Now, this tells us not only that a day is something other than merely a 24hr period of various lighting conditions, but that God stayed on Earth when he did these things and Adam was created in the sixth of these cycles:
==> 6000 x 365 x 6000 = 13 140 000 000 years.
I'd say that is pretty close to what science says. Don't you? And it was written like that a few centuries BC. Quite amazing.
No, it is not remotely close to what science says. Familiarize yourself with science.
Measurements by the WMAP satellite […] enable us to determine the age of the universe is 13.77 billion years, with an uncertainty of only 0.4%
You're attempting to discuss something with people devoid of integrity.
[Integrity] is a personal choice, an uncompromising and predictably consistent commitment to honor moral, ethical, spiritual and artistic values and principles.[1]
They have the right to preach just as you have the right to tell them not to
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: Utnapisjtim
originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: Murgatroid
So absolute is not truth, it is a state of nothingness, which is only true to itself.
Just bumping in to defend Murgatroid here, not something I often do btw, Old Hermes Trismegistus would beg to differ, not just Jesus and Plato. Dealing with the truth is one of the most lethal things you can do. It's like sticking your head out of a train. It's all about timing really. And knowing your way around sarcasm and irony can literally save your life.
Meaningless entirely, every part of it is using logic that is unable to see any farther than it is allowed too.
Exqueeze me, but that's sodding nonsense, not all truth is self-evident. In fact, very little of what can be called Truth is is in any way self evident. Only a very few words in the dictionary are onomatopoetika, and yet, you will have to understand profound codes and cyphers called language in spoken and written form to get the full understanding of it.
A problem arises when people confuse truth with fact.
Truth is a belief. There are many beliefs and, as such, there is no such thing as THE Truth. Put another way, one person's truth is not another person's truth.
Unlike truth, facts are supported by testable evidence. I know that it is common to use the words interchangeably but it leads to problems, especially when someone wields truth as the sword of a supernatural deity/creator.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
Meaningless entirely, every part of it is using logic that is unable to see any farther than it is allowed too.
“Only in receiving can we know.” ~ Hilary of Poitiers
“You are Israel’s teacher,” said Jesus, “and do you not understand these things? Very truly I tell you, we speak of what we know, and we testify to what we have seen, but still you people do not accept our testimony. I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things? John 3:10-12
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. ~ 1 Corinthians 2:14
And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. ~ 2 Corinthians 4:3
originally posted by: graphuto
the Bible plainly says that those who aren't saved, literally can't understand God and His Word.