It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Aliensun
a reply to: Nechash
When you get down to it, there can be no ethics of survival. Rather than having 200 people and needing to reduce the number to 199, let's it simplify your argument. Let's have only two people and what ever the situation, one must die fairly quickly. How do you think that will play out ethically? I would wager that the survivor would not have been very ethical.
Sorry for what he/she did, but the goal was surviving, right? Survival one, ethics zero.