It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


US Turns $486 Million Afghan Air Fleet into $32,000 of Scrap Metal

page: 1

log in


posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 10:07 AM

Yeah Yeah Yeah! Our Tax Dollars Hard at Work, yet again. SO we wonder why we went broke with The War on Terror. It looks like the whole thing was just one Big Boondoggle to get more spending moved forward on totally wasteful "Good Ideas".

So what do you thing My ATS Brethren and Sisterhood. Is this what We As A People want our elected representatives spending our Hard Earned on. Or maybe is it time to really tighten up on all the Insane Spending Fantasies, that'll supposedly make us safer (at a very high price)?

Mods, If this isn't the right forum for this article, please feel free to move it and I have done a search foor anything about this on ATS and can find nothing. Thanks All My ATS Friends and Family
Peace Arjunanda.

The U.S. has destroyed 16 cargo planes it purchased for almost half a billion dollars for the Afghan Air Force and sold the scrap metal for $32,000.

The Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) is asking the Air Force why the fleet of G222 aircraft were turned into scrap metal this past August. They had sat idle for years on the tarmac at Kabul International Airport.

The remaining four G-222 aircraft are now in storage at the U.S. Air Force base in Ramstein, Germany. No final decision has been made on their future.

In 2008, NATO purchased 20 of the Italian-made aircraft for $486 million in hopes that they could serve cargo and transit needs for Afghanistan’s new air force. But it quickly became apparent that the aircraft were not suited for the dusty conditions found in Afghanistan and required constant maintenance and spare parts.

According to a letter sent by SIGAR to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, the G222 program was terminated in March 2013 “after sustained, serious performance, maintenance, and spare parts problems and the planes were grounded.”

John Sopko, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, wrote to Hagel that his office had been reviewing the purchase of the planes, but said he had recently been made aware that the aircraft “were turned over to the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) and have since been scrapped.”

In a separate letter to Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James, Sopko wrote that the aircraft had been recently “towed to the far side of the airport and scrapped by the Defense Logistics Agency.”

“I was also informed that an Afghan construction company paid approximately 6 cents a pound for the scraped planes, which came to a total of $32,000, ”said Sopko.

Sopko said he was concerned that the American defense officials involved in the scrapping of the aircraft “may not have considered other possible alternatives in order to salvage taxpayer dollars."

According to Sopko’s office the aircraft never met expectations and only flew 234 of the 4,500 flight hours required from January to September 2012 because of constant maintenance issues and a lack of spare parts.

A defense spokesman said the planes were purchased “as an interim solution to meet the medium airlift needs of Afghanistan.”

Major Bradlee Avots confirmed that the aircraft at the airport in Kabul had been destroyed “to minimize impact on drawdown of U.S. Forces in Afghanistan.” The American military force is currently drawing down from its current levels of 26,000 to a force of 9,800 that for the next two years will continue to advise and assist Afghanistan’s security forces.

Avots said that the DOD and the Air Force are still determining what to do with the remaining four aircraft including “screening for outside interest.” He noted that working in a wartime environment presents challenges “and we continually seek to improve our processes.”

Sopko is requesting that the Air Force provide all documents related to the decision to scrap the aircraft in Kabul.

edit on 10-10-2014 by arjunanda because: Link Not Working Properly

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 10:14 AM
Check your link.

Just thought I would let you know.

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 10:17 AM
Thanks for that tsurfer, I'll get to fixin; it L) Arjunanda a reply to: tsurfer2000h

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 10:23 AM
a reply to: arjunanda

For airplanes, "scrap" metal is just that. Low grade mix of various metals and plastic that have to be taken apart or "reduced" so they can be recycled back into metals.

The aluminum has steel nuts, bolts and rivets, the copper wire is insulated, components like electronics, rubber tires, glass or plastic, liquids like coolant and hydraulics all present problems for the recycling and refining industries.

What will be produce from "scrap" will eventually be pure ingots of copper, aluminum and steel but right now it is a logistical nightmare of disassembly, toxic waste and transport of what is referred to as contaminated or dirty by the metals industry. Someone has to do all that menial "scrapping" and transporting and thats why the price per pound is so low.

They did it on that runway so that none of the technology will be utilized by the "enemy". There will be nothing but a toxic waste dump when they are done.

Weapons for war are designed to be used up or destroyed, not returned to the factory.

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 10:33 AM
Air Force’s $486 Million in Planes Reap $32,000 as Scrap in Afghanistan

This is absolutely outrageous! I can't even begin to explain how much this pisses me off! Think of better things that could have been done with the planes and the initial $486 billion in the first place! I can't even imagine a room full of moronic bureaucrats sitting around a table agreeing that this was a good idea.

posted on Oct, 10 2014 @ 10:46 AM
This was posted yesterday, here.

Please leave your comments there.


Thread closed.

new topics

top topics

log in