It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Indigo5
a reply to: Flatfish
I called it earlier on this page with a post to you. What you missed was that Justice Scalia had the "honor" of determining whether or not the ruling would be reviewed by Scotus. Texas fell under his district, so it was his call alone.
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Indigo5
Yeah ok, you can quote what's on the books and I'm telling you that I have NEVER showed ANY type of id to register to vote, and I vote EVERY election.
So you're full of #.
Jaden
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Indigo5
Yeah ok, you can quote what's on the books and I'm telling you that I have NEVER showed ANY type of id to register to vote, and I vote EVERY election.
So you're full of #.
Jaden
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Indigo5
Yeah ok, you can quote what's on the books and I'm telling you that I have NEVER showed ANY type of id to register to vote, and I vote EVERY election.
So you're full of #.
Jaden
You provided your SS and or DL number to register to vote. Plus verified your address. And what I "quoted" was the CA registers office outlining precisely how and what is required to register to vote. Give them a call and explain to them you think they are "full of Sh*&".
Sorry reality frustrates you.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Indigo5
Yeah ok, you can quote what's on the books and I'm telling you that I have NEVER showed ANY type of id to register to vote, and I vote EVERY election.
So you're full of #.
Jaden
When you obtained your driver's license its possible you were automatically registered to vote. I know the DMV in my state does that.