It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Ebola Outbreak: Gates Foundation Commits $50m

page: 1

log in


posted on Sep, 10 2014 @ 04:15 PM
So Bill & Melinda Gates has been teaming up with their partners to find a cure for Ebola.
Remember this

Bill Gates wants depopulation through vaccines.

Todays news

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has pledged $50m (£31m) to support the fight against the deadly ebola outbreak in West Africa. The money will go to the United Nations and international organisations attempting to bolster emergency efforts to contain the current epidemic, which has led to more than 2,200 deaths. "We are working urgently with our partners to identify the most effective ways to help them save lives now and stop transmission of this deadly disease," the foundation's CEO Sue Desmond-Hellmann said in a release. "We also want to accelerate the development of treatments, vaccines and diagnostics that can help end this epidemic and prevent future outbreaks."

More Source

Are you ready for vaccine Bill is working for.. take a leap of faith ?

edit on 10-9-2014 by dollukka because: (no reason given)

posted on Sep, 10 2014 @ 04:18 PM
I know it'll happen but I'm not in support of this. They use him as the public mouthpiece for the agenda.

He'll take the heat instead of the true bad people. S + F

posted on Sep, 10 2014 @ 04:20 PM
10 million less than he spends on promoting GMOs...

posted on Sep, 10 2014 @ 04:24 PM
a reply to: TheBlackTiger

I have a feeling he wouldn't even eat GMO food.

Like the Simpsons episode when Mr. Burns is served Blinky the three-eyed fish. He spits it out on camera.

posted on Sep, 10 2014 @ 04:28 PM
a reply to: Yeahkeepwatchingme

Most likely so.. Obamas are also promoting GMO food but grown their own organic veggies which pretty much tells that they don´t eat GMO either.
Would they take the vaccine.. If they are going to make a one against Ebola they should be first in line to take it. And that vaccine what they get should be verified as an actual one ( somehow )

posted on Sep, 10 2014 @ 04:42 PM
a reply to: dollukka

Seriously? That video has been so misinterpreted it's ridiculous. There is a difference between "depopulation" (killing people) and "population control" (which we either need, or will need).

Think what you will. Bill and Melinda Gates are probably among the greatest philanthropists of our time, if not the greatest.

This vid shows that no good deed goes unpunished.

posted on Sep, 10 2014 @ 05:25 PM
a reply to: dollukka

I'm amazed that all these years later this video is still being grossly misinterpreted. The simply truth is that as quality of healthcare increases people choose to have fewer children. This is due to the fact that the uncertainty of whether or not your child will survive infancy is no longer there. So yes, by bringing vaccines and other medical help to these developing nations we are in a way causing population growth to decrease. But it's not because the help we are bringing is causing mass death and sterility.

posted on Sep, 10 2014 @ 06:59 PM


“We know how to get agricultural productivity up, but not that much,” he says. “Jobs, unrest, education—a high population density makes solving all those problems harder.”

So in 1997, when he and Melinda first ventured into public health—their eponymous foundation would come into being in two years—they focused on birth control, funding a Johns Hopkins effort to use computers to help women in the developing world learn about contraception. The logic was crisp and Bill Gates-friendly. Health = resources ÷ people. And since resources, as Gates noted, are relatively fixed, the answer lay in population control. Thus, vaccines made no sense to him: Why save kids only to consign them to life in overcrowded countries where they risked starving to death or being killed in civil war?"

edit on 9101414 by Eliyahu because: (no reason given)


log in