Massive Times Square Billboard to Show Video of WTC 7 Destruction During 9/11 Anniversary

sickening.

i cant believe so many people think this is ok

originally posted by: SyxPak
Guess I am just getting tired of all the ignorant people arguing for the sake of just arguing.

Funny that, that is exactly what you are doing , ignoring the facts and just posting truther silly made up stories....

Evidence stares them in the face, and they just don't see it.

Again, that is so funny, your "evidence" comes from sites where someone just made it up!

a reply to: magicrat

Yah that second one is definitely a strange one eh? I thought that same thing about the LACK of emotion when that building actually DID fall! LOL!!! Man, how cold right?

Perhaps the old saying, "The Truth Hurts", applies to this.

I watch that video the OP posted and I think how can anybody watch that and not have questions, or is the cognitive dissonance so strong backed up by years patriotic propaganda, it can never be broken ???

To those in that category I feel pity for you.

a reply to: hellobruce


SO I guess Me and Thousands, perhaps Millions of Others have all made this stuff up? Wow!

Blue_Jay33 says this at 8:20 AM ;

"Perhaps the old saying, "The Truth Hurts", applies to this.

I watch that video the OP posted and I think how can anybody watch that and not have questions, or is the cognitive dissonance so strong backed up by years patriotic propaganda, it can never be broken ???

To those in that category I feel pity for you."

I agree 100% with that Post! And now because of that, I actually feel bad for trying to convince you of the Truth of all this. You cannot help but feel the way you do, (unless you are being paid,) about these facts......
Just Common Sense should tell You that maybe, just maybe You are Wrong! NO harm in that now is there? Hell. I have already admitted to being wrong at least twice, I believe, in just this thread alone!

Look, no one wants to wake up one day and realize their whole life, well parts of it anyway, are a lie that's been told to them by a supposedly trusted source, right?
I know I didn't want to believe it is the way it is. Until I investigated on my own, and made up my own mind that things just don't add up. They Did Not Look Right!! Just a little bit of sound realization, and some down to earth thoughts led me to my decision that it was all a lie!
So let's just agree, to disagree, alright?
How about we leave it at that......?

a reply to: SyxPak

Look, no one wants to wake up one day and realize their whole life, well parts of it anyway, are a lie that's been told to them by a supposedly trusted source, right?

Well said, I have always emphasized this.

It's a difficult thing to wake up and realize that most of what you were told since you were born in regards to world events is a big fat lie, many people realize this and fight it but most of us are willing to admit we were wrong and continue researching which ever topic in the hopes to unravel the lies and uncover the truth.

As the member you quoted said, it probably has a lot to do with years of patriotic propaganda. This comes to us via the school system, media/government and other brainwashed friends/family members.

I remember shortly after 9/11, I had a friend who was much more aware than most people and we used to make fun of him so bad. It turns out the joke was on us, I realized this eventually and apologized to him and thanked him for opening the doors.

I was one of those schmucks that actually believed parts of the official story until my friend showed me the free-fall collapse of WTC7. This lead me to viciously research this topic and I have learned so much about our world since then.

The events of 9/11 have caused many people to question pretty much anything the media and or government tells us due to the many lies which have been exposed, partly due to their own screw ups such as the BBC announcing WTC7's collapse 26 minutes before it happened on live television.

Here we are 13 years later and the criminals who orchestrated this attack are still living the high life and profiting from the wars that this event lead up to and there is no end in sight.

They may act stupid but they are some clever bastards.
(the people behind the curtain)

Anyone who is semi-conscious in NYC knows that a 'third building fell on 9-11' by now.

What they REALLY need to point out to the denizens of NYC is that they were effing NUKED on 9-11, and that the people responsible for it won't hesitate to do it again if it suits their purposes. Cheney, Bush and a few hundred other accomplices need to be indicted on mass murder charges. The rest of the world knows what happened, what's wrong with the United States, besides mass psychosis?

I refer you, yet once again because people don't seem to be willing to do the tiny bit of reading that's required to truly understand what happened, to the Jeff Prager DUST material:

Jeff Prager Notes

He's done all the work for you, and there's a reason that you've perhaps never heard of him, and yet that government shill Steven Jones and his smooth-voiced helper Richard Gage are all over the place; because THEIR 'research' will lead to a dead end if it ever goes to a grand jury; there is no way thermite brought down those buildings, not by itself. They'd be laughed out of court, which is the Plan B if it came to that.

If you're going to explain everything that occurred on 9-11 and the aftermath, you need to account for ALL the evidence. Thermite can't cause sustained heat in the piles hot enough to melt steel, glass and rock, no way would 'they' have been able to load the buildings with enough thermite to cause that blast effect we all saw (was thermite packed up against every missing desk, toilet and person, too???) and thermite wouldn't cause the hot dust cloud that was dense enough to blow people down the street, lighting cars on fire as it went. Thermite doesn't explain the witness testimony that they saw people 'evaporate' either. Hell, the evidence is right there in the massive steel assembles falling out and down from the towers, streaming SMOKING STEEL from them as they fell... how much heat do you think THAT requires?

Read the first responder testimony, for crying out loud!!!!

NY Times 9-11 Oral Histories

From page 5 until this page, the arguments and counter arguments of facts, or alleged facts, are what makes ATS special.

Sorry for the off topic post but, threads like these are not only a reminder of uncertainty, but also a valuable point of it too, if that makes sense.

Click here to learn more about this warning.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP

originally posted by: CaticusMaximus

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Another failed attempt to sow distrust among the people of their government.
Taken straight out of the communist manifesto playbook.
Putin couldn't have trained them any better when he was head of KGB.

"Another failed attempt", "communist manifesto", "Putin", "KGB"... WTF are you blabbering on about?

First off, this is a present and future event, not a past event, so speaking of it in the past tense is bizarre.

Second, communism, Putin, and the KGB have nothing to do with anything here whatsoever.

Third... WTF are you blabbering on about? This is about getting the truth out of the controlled demolition of building 7, which is blatantly obvious to anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together. Building 7 is largely unknown because its the smoking gun of this whole sham and is actively avoided when speaking about 9/11. It was even completely excluded from the official 9/11 report.

Please try and post coherently and on topic, because the topic is very important and should not be watered down with nonsense.

Truther crap = nonsense.

Millions of tons of material came crashing to the ground from two towers of amazing height, ya lets call fake and not even consider what that would do to the stability of footings in nearby structures on land that was reclaimed from swamp when built.

Putting that garbage on a big screen on the anniversary of the disaster is a propaganda event which its only intention is to sow the seeds of doubt in govt, can't get a better definition of communist manifesto doctrine implementation than that.

Hahah, you really are stretching. Yes big boom make other building fall.

Nice.

Do you recall the court case in the UK where a gentleman said he would not pay his TV tax (they tax it in the UK) because the tax was to support the reporting of real news, and on 911 the UK reported building 7 falling 20 minutes before it actually fell. So in court the guy proved it was already known and so it was not real news but instead a planned detonation.

He won the case, didnt have to pay his TV tax.

a reply to: pluginkid

I'm gonna believe the 2,200 hundred plus architects and engineers that agree this was a controlled demolition over some moron who doesn't know what the hell he is talking about.

You might want to read the bio's on these 2200.
Most do not have the qualifications to back up your claims.
And none of them are in the CD business.

So their opinions are no better than yours.

originally posted by: SyxPak
a reply to: magicrat

Yah that second one is definitely a strange one eh? I thought that same thing about the LACK of emotion when that building actually DID fall! LOL!!! Man, how cold right?

Let me get this straight. 9/11..terrorist attack.....two towers just collapsed....hundreds dead....ENTIRE Manhattan one big pile of chaos & smoke....and you expect the news anchor showing big emotion because ANOTHER building fell down? (Where t was already clear for hours that the building was damaged).

What's that emotion supposed to be? "OMGZ people! You won't believe what just happened....but this really takes the cake....this building just collapsed!!!"

(Mind the fact that no one was actually in that building as far as I know.)

On the background of the entire events of 9/11 on that day, the collapse of WTC7 is (almost) TRIVIAL and sure not an event which would have warranted major emotions as you seem to think.

I say start a revolution, theres no other way our government will admit it. I never thought cnn would talk about this:

thelead.blogs.cnn.com...

I feel like were getting closer to literally everyone in the world knowing the truth but still so far away.

a reply to: Zcustosmorum

I read the book "the new pearl harbor" which was pretty good. Is this the movie of the book?

It was always obvious to me, all 3 buildings were a controlled demolition. Further proof is in the video of building 7 coming down, it was collapsing instantly at the very top.

Soon it won't be possible to conceal this lie any longer. The next fight will be a new lie about who's responsible.

originally posted by: SyxPak
a reply to: nOraKat

Engineers and Architects that Built those buildings stated that they could withstand multiple jet plane impacts before they would even think of coming down. Said they were like the screen on your door. Punch a hole in it, and the rest is just fine.

Ever since I witnessed 9/11, I have *NEVER* seen any official architect, builder, designer of the WTC etc. sees stating in public that the events of 9/11, the fact that the towers collapsed, were impossible.

But this is what you claim!

Also...if what you claim is true (that the collapse of the WTC due to a plane impact would be "physically impossible")...how absurd then would be the idea of a controlled demolition AFTER those plane impacts....if it would be known that a plane CAN not even bring down a tower? You are aware that your theory doesn't make any sense at all?! If it was known (as you claim) the towers cannot fall, no-one would have staged a demolition to produce an event which is so not even possible!

Hmm do people still not know what it looks like when a building is professionally demolished?

The human mind just baffles me.

Forget about the towers, just look at Building 7 in its own right. Those support columns buckled before the building fell. They didn't just buckle little by little they all buckled simultaneously. That doesn't happen unless you make it happen.

Looking at some of the responses on this thread makes it obvious that this website is buggy with operatives. They're working a little too hard trying to prove a turd tastes good.

a reply to: jidnum

Those support columns buckled before the building fell. They didn't just buckle little by little they all buckled simultaneously. That doesn't happen unless you make it happen.

Do you have the expertise to back that up?
Or are just another internet expert?

originally posted by: NoRulesAllowed

Also...if what you claim is true (that the collapse of the WTC due to a plane impact would be "physically impossible")...how absurd then would be the idea of a controlled demolition AFTER those plane impacts....if it would be known that a plane CAN not even bring down a tower? You are aware that your theory doesn't make any sense at all?! If it was known (as you claim) the towers cannot fall, no-one would have staged a demolition to produce an event which is so not even possible!

Amen.
One simple, logical paragraph undoing eight pages of nonsense.