What form of government would Jesus go for?.

a reply to: boymonkey74

communism.

Jesus was a communist.

a reply to: HUMBLEONE

And He wouldn't give a squirt about Your sex life or lack of... Then He would say "That really doesn't resonate with Me.." and then everybody else would write Him off as a "new age whacko" .... Just like before.. ergo,

J don't play...

a reply to: boymonkey74

Heaven is a dictatorship because God is The Ruler, but God lives in those who love others (1 John 4:12) so it is a dictatorship but it is a dictatorship of Compassion (love thy neighbor as thyself, do unto others as you would have them do to you). Compassion is Freedom, without compassion people would not care if they hurt others or if others are in pain. Compassion is what brings Freedom. With Compassion we can help one another and show love and support for one another. Heaven is Freedom because God (Love) is The Truth and Truth sets you Free.

a reply to: boymonkey74

Dictatorship with a loving caring Dictator. It's the best form of government as well imo.

a reply to: boymonkey74

He's a monarchist. His system of economics doesn't matter, because it would be anti-democratic aka totalitarian. At least under either socialism or capitalism, stakeholders have some say.

When you know yourself, then you will be known, and you will understand that you are a child of the living Father. But if you do not know yourself, then you live in poverty, and you are the poverty."

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: boymonkey74

Dictatorship with a loving caring Dictator. It's the best form of government as well imo.

Loving and caring dictator? Are we talking about the same dude that basically wiped out the Firstborn, some of whom would've been mere children, just to force a Pharaoh's hand? The same dude whose claimed to have wiped out all but a few off the face of the earth and turned an innocent women to salt for simply looking behind her?

Doesn't seem very loving to me.

originally posted by: Nechash
a reply to: boymonkey74

He's a monarchist. His system of economics doesn't matter, because it would be anti-democratic aka totalitarian. At least under either socialism or capitalism, stakeholders have some say.

Not under current forms of capitalism. Currently, the primary stakeholders for all corporations are its shareholders, period. What a corp opts to consider as a stakeholder beyond that is mere "suggestion". One of the things that we had to learn in the School of Business was to identify not only the obvious stakeholders but also those less obvious ones as a way to correct capitalism in the future. Even with that little subtle change, the actual calculations for deciding whether or not to make a change within a business had no way of calculating in what stakeholders thought. It was pretty much pure cost-benefit analysis on which would be more profitable.