It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If that's the case then how can we be so sure that the NT isn't a copy made by fallen angels (those of us who desire power) as well? The bible has given enormous power to the very few elites since its conception.
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: AlephBet
My views are constantly changing with new information, something we share in common it seems. Plus I'm not as "headstrong" as I used to be, I don't resist change as much as I did a few months ago.
originally posted by: WarminIndy
a reply to: AlephBet
Your first picture is a typo.
And Aleph in Egyptian hieroglyphics is a falcon. How does that fit in?
The story of the fallen angels gives us concern that the message we hear may be from a malevolent source.
If Greek is the mirror of Hebrew then wouldn't that mean the story of Jesus (written in Greek) is only a mirror image or "copy" of the original story etched within the Hebrew alphabet?
originally posted by: WarminIndy
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Except that Paleo Hebrew was the written language before the square form from the 5th Century Baylon, the pictures he is posting now is not Paleo Hebrew, which is closely related to Pheonician.
The Phoenician alphabet is based on Egyptian hieroglyphics. Unless the OP introduces the Egyptian meanings in the hieroglyphics then he misses a huge point.
The ox head is from Proto Siniatic.
originally posted by: WarminIndy
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
Except that Paleo Hebrew was the written language before the square form from the 5th Century Baylon, the pictures he is posting now is not Paleo Hebrew, which is closely related to Pheonician.
The Phoenician alphabet is based on Egyptian hieroglyphics. Unless the OP introduces the Egyptian meanings in the hieroglyphics then he misses a huge point.
The ox head is from Proto Siniatic.
originally posted by: AlephBet
a reply to: Rex282
Shine a light on the information and the form is seen. Light reveals what it hits.
Direct DNA damage
Due to the excellent photochemical properties of DNA, this nature-made molecule is damaged only by a tiny fraction of the absorbed photons. DNA transforms more than 99.9% of the photons into harmless heat[3] (But the damage from the remaining < 0.1% of the photons is still enough to cause sunburn).[1] The transformation of excitation energy into harmless heat occurs via a photochemical process called internal conversion. In DNA, this internal conversion is extremely fast—and therefore efficient. This ultrafast (subpicosecond) internal conversion is an extremely powerful photoprotection provided by single nucleotides.[3] However, the Ground-State Recovery is much slower (picoseconds) in G·C−DNA duplexes and hairpins.[4] It is presumed to be even slower for double-stranded DNA in conditions of the nucleus. The absorption spectrum of DNA shows a strong absorption for UVB-radiation and a much lower absorption for UVA-radiation. Since the action spectrum of sunburn is identical to the absorption spectrum of DNA, it is generally accepted that the direct DNA damages are the cause of sunburn.[1] While the human body reacts to direct DNA damages with a painful warning signal,[1] no such warning signal is generated from indirect DNA damage.
John 1:4
In him was life, and that life was the light of all mankind
Shining light in DNA directly damages it. Also there are various strands at various stages such as during replication.
Which strand variant in your tent was purposely damaged in order to show shadow figures on the tent wall?
I call phooey to your whole enlightenment.
Destruction of life to convey information, the use of light in a destructive way. All very opposite of what is said about light and life in the actual bible.
originally posted by: AlephBet
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Shining light in DNA directly damages it. Also there are various strands at various stages such as during replication.
Which strand variant in your tent was purposely damaged in order to show shadow figures on the tent wall?
I call phooey to your whole enlightenment.
Destruction of life to convey information, the use of light in a destructive way. All very opposite of what is said about light and life in the actual bible.
You missed the point.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: AlephBet
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Shining light in DNA directly damages it. Also there are various strands at various stages such as during replication.
Which strand variant in your tent was purposely damaged in order to show shadow figures on the tent wall?
I call phooey to your whole enlightenment.
Destruction of life to convey information, the use of light in a destructive way. All very opposite of what is said about light and life in the actual bible.
You missed the point.
In the very first post of this thread you instruct people to read your other threads, therefore how did I miss the point when I went exactly as instructed all the way back to your original premise that spawned all of these threads?