It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: karmicecstasy
a reply to: beezzer
In your head that might be what your doing. But from your words it seems like something completely different. Maybe its just me that sees it that way. I dont know.
originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
originally posted by: beezzer
Why do you have an issue with government having less and the people having more?
I'll step up to this one:
Because if anything the majority of this thread has taught me is that the "People" who seek to overthrow the Government would just continue the trend of sociopathic behavior along the same lines as the very system they condemn....except in their version of the New Order, they would be in charge so everything will be to their personal advantage.
Face it, even if by some chance "the People" overthrew TPTB what on Earth makes you think they'd be any more compassionate and caring to those in need and those lower on the scale than themselves?
Please...I see it every day - thousands of people tooling around in their new cars on their way home from jobs they're lucky enough to have avoiding eye contact and ignoring the poor SOB on the side of the road who is just asking for a little spare change for a sandwich, a little reassurance of humanity perhaps. Why? Because he's "taking advantage of my hard earned dollar. Bum needs to get a job." and other such rubbish.
Yeah, these people are so overworked and blindsided to the rat race that they've tuned out and reduced anyone not in their demographic to a non-human status. Classy. Real classy. Classic "class warfare" if you catch my drift.
I have never seen or met anyone who advocates an overthrow who has anything to offer that would care for people who didn't fit into their personal ideals of human productivity and behaviors.
In survival of the fittest the brutes will just leave the weak, infirm, undesirable and elderly to suffer and die because they couldn't pull their own weight....because all praise the glorious and almighty dollar.
Every one is just mimicking the current political process but somehow it's more meaningful because it's Average Joe.
Unfortunately, as well meaning as Average Joe may be, he fails to see the inherent hypocrisy in his own words and actions.
originally posted by: eManym
a reply to: Dingo80
What I meant by my post was, why don't these workers learn a skill that pays higher wages rather than working several jobs at the same level?
originally posted by: Bilk22
The world has always been a "sad place". Just read history. We now have the internet, so we just hear about it sooner.
originally posted by: proob4
It's a sad, sad world today!
originally posted by: eManym
I understand the economy is bad but for someone working four jobs, it wouldn't last long because sleep deprivation has its problems.
originally posted by: beezzer
Policy Basics: Where Do Our Federal Tax Dollars Go?
Linky
Defense and international security assistance: In 2013, 19 percent of the budget, or $643 billion, paid for defense and security-related international activities.
. . . .
Social Security: Another 24 percent of the budget, or $814 billion, paid for Social Security, which provided monthly retirement benefits averaging $1,294 to 37.9 million retired workers in December 2013.
. . . .
Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP: Three health insurance programs — Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) — together accounted for 22 percent of the budget in 2013, or $772 billion.
. . . .
Safety net programs: About 12 percent of the federal budget in 2013, or $398 billion, supported programs that provide aid (other than health insurance or Social Security benefits) to individuals and families facing hardship.
Plus there's a neat chart on the link I provided.
So cutting the big D-fence is all good and well. But we aren't starving social programs as it is.
We're doing something wrong though. We are pouring money down the drain. We "ain't" getting a return on the investment of all these social programs.
Maybe these social programs are part of the problem, because they sure as hell aren't part of the solution!
Why artificially increase the cost of living? Who is this benefiting?
Dillion went on to say that even though his total compensation was nearly $13 million last year, he was still only in the bottom 25 percent of CEO pay among peer companies.
The average CEO pay at America's top 350 companies was $15.2 million in 2013, according to the Economic Policy Institute
Since 1978, inflation-adjusted CEO pay has increased a staggering 937 percent while a typical worker's wages have only increased by about 10 percent, according to the EPI.
CEOs at these top companies now make roughly 293 times the annual wages of their employees. By contrast, in 1978 the typical chief executive made about 20 times what his or her workers earned.
OUTSOURCING.