It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Californians already pay the nation's second highest gas tax at 68 cents a gallon -- and now it will go up again in January to pay for a first-in-the-nation climate change law.
"I didn't know that," said Los Angeles motorist Tyler Rich. "It's ridiculous."
"I think it’s terrible," added Lupe Sanchez, pumping $4.09-a-gallon gas at a Chevron near Santa Monica. "The economy, the way it is right now with jobs and everything, it's just crazy."
When gas prices go up, motorists typically blame oil companies, Arab sheiks and Wall Street speculators. This time they can blame Sacramento and former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger for passing a bill requiring California to reduce carbon emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
The tax on carbon already raised about $1 billion in revenue by requiring manufacturers and utilities to buy credits for each ton of carbon emitted into the atmosphere. At the beginning of next year, the law will also apply to oil and gas. Refiners and distributors say they will pass another $2 billion in costs on - largely to consumers.
"Ultimately it hurts the consumer," said California Independent Oil and Marketing Association spokesman Mike Rohrer. "It is going to affect anyone who has a vehicle. [u]Be it a motorist that is commuting back and forth to work or a trucker just moving goods throughout the state of California, the cost is immediately going to increase because whatever we have to pay for in carbon credits ultimately we have to pass through to the consumer."
I just don't get it. How is this tax going to help with climate change.
a reply to: IBossJekler
I just don't get it. How is this tax going to help with climate change.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
As a near life long Californian, that came from Europe were Gasoline has always been very high compared to 'subsidized' (by indirect tax-payer dollars' ) I'm all in favor of the added tax.
The US has always had low gas prices. This was so to addict us to cars and cheap shipping costs.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
As a near life long Californian, that came from Europe were Gasoline has always been very high compared to 'subsidized' (by indirect tax-payer dollars' ) I'm all in favor of the added tax.
The US has always had low gas prices. This was so to addict us to cars and cheap shipping costs.
a reply to: IBossJekler
There is no going back and the money isn't being invested in technology that can help with anything. I really would love to be able to watch where each penny of this actually goes.
Gore tells consumers how to change their lives to curb their carbon-gobbling ways: Switch to compact fluorescent light bulbs, use a clothesline, drive a hybrid, use renewable energy, dramatically cut back on consumption. Better still, responsible global citizens can follow Gore's example, because, as he readily points out in his speeches, he lives a "carbon-neutral lifestyle." But if Al Gore is the world's role model for ecology, the planet is doomed.
He says he recycles and drives a hybrid. And he claims he uses renewable energy credits to offset the pollution he produces when using a private jet to promote his film. (In reality, Paramount Classics, the film's distributor, pays this.)
Public records reveal that as Gore lectures Americans on excessive consumption, he and his wife Tipper live in two properties: a 10,000-square-foot, 20-room, eight-bathroom home in Nashville, and a 4,000-square-foot home in Arlington, Va. (He also has a third home in Carthage, Tenn.) For someone rallying the planet to pursue a path of extreme personal sacrifice, Gore requires little from himself.
Then there is the troubling matter of his energy use. In the Washington, D.C., area, utility companies offer wind energy as an alternative to traditional energy. In Nashville, similar programs exist. Utility customers must simply pay a few extra pennies per kilowatt hour, and they can continue living their carbon-neutral lifestyles knowing that they are supporting wind energy. Plenty of businesses and institutions have signed up. Even the Bush administration is using green energy for some federal office buildings, as are thousands of area residents.
But according to public records, there is no evidence that Gore has signed up to use green energy in either of his large residences.
13. Can a private individual register and open an account to buy allowances for
private use or retirement?
Yes, individuals are eligible to open accounts as a general market participant to
acquire, hold, and retire compliance instruments. Individuals must complete user
registration and following registration approval must apply for accounts as a
general market participant (individual). General market participant individuals are
allowed to act as both required representatives on their accounts or may
designate additional individuals as account representatives.
14. I am a student at a university; can I register and open an account? Are
there requirements relating to experience, credit, or assets?
Any individual can register as a user and apply for accounts in the CITSS as an
individual general market participant as long as they meet the requirements for
user registration and account application outlined in the Regulation. There are
no experience or credit requirements for opening a compliance instrument
account as an individual general market participant
Steinberg proposed that the state increase the price at the pump by 15 cents a gallon starting in 2015. That number would increase to 43 cents a gallon in 2030.
"Higher prices discourage demand. if carbon pricing doesn't sting, at least a little bit, we won't change our habits," Steinberg said.
Steinberg believes that the tax will force people to not drive as much, and in turn, decrease the amount of carbon pollution
originally posted by: okrian
I'd be for it if…
- It were nationwide.
- People actually get out of the crazy denial mentality that all the pollutants we put into the air aren't affecting our climate (and air we breathe, and our environment, native species, etc.).
Until both of those things happen we won't be able to make any progress (or regress, as it were), or be able to spend this money on any viable solution. Too many people are buying into the big oil (and other non-renewable energy) propaganda and fighting the corporate fight for them. Sad.
Fixing the destruction will not be profitable. That's just the way it is.
Massachusetts has one of the highest cigarette taxes in the country – $2.51 on every pack. Last year that meant $562 million in state revenue. The big tobacco settlement brought in another $315 million. However, out of the nearly $900 million the state took in from cigarette taxes and settlement funds, lawmakers dedicated only $4.5 million to anti-smoking programs this year.
“Right now the program is funded at less than 1% of what the state brings in in tobacco revenue,” said Russet Morrow Breslau, the head of Tobacco Free Mass, a consortium of health groups.
Almost all of that revenue goes into the state’s general fund. Not a penny is earmarked for anti-smoking,
“You can’t balance the budget on the backs of smokers,” Breslau said.