It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Operating with cutting-edge technology out of a trailer in rural Illinois, government researchers started today on a set of experiments that they say will help them determine whether or not you and me and everything that exists are living in a two-dimensional holographic universe.
It sounds completely off-the-walls insane, but the incongruities between Albert Einstein's theory of relativity and some of Max Planck's discoveries about the nature of matter can only be explained if we're living in a Matrix-style holographic illusion, according to Craig Hogan, director of the Department of Energy's Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics.
"For thousands of years, we have assumed that space is made of points and lines," he told me. "Maybe that is not right—it might be made of waves, the way that matter and energy are."
In a lab called the Holometer, which uses ultra high-powered lasers, of course. Fermilab explained it better than I can in a release:
Now operating at full power, the Holometer uses a pair of interferometers placed close to one another. Each one sends a one-kilowatt laser beam (the equivalent of 200,000 laser pointers) at a beam splitter and down two perpendicular 40-meter arms. The light is then reflected back to the beam splitter where the two beams recombine, creating fluctuations in brightness if there is motion. Researchers analyze these fluctuations in the returning light to see if the beam splitter is moving in a certain way—being carried along on a jitter of space itself.
So, if the team detects movement, it's possible that the movement is being caused by space not being a completely set thing, in which case, we could be living in the Matrix. Hogan told me that, if we are indeed living in a hologram, "the basic effect is that reality has a limited amount of information, like a Netflix movie when Comcast is not giving you enough bandwidth. So things are a little blurry and jittery. Nothing ever just stands still, but is always moving a tiny bit."
originally posted by: jonnywhite
I've never understood how we could possibly know whether reality is real or "simulated". Even if we found out there're a limited number of discrete points in our universe, so what? If there're no discrete points, so what? I don't see the "point".
I realize they're trying to say if there're infinite points then it's not computable because you'd need a computer with infinite size. My problem with that's how do we know if our instruments aren't sensitive enough? Surely the creators of our simulation can determine which tools we have access to and which values they'll create, and thus have complete control over our conclusions.
originally posted by: Iamthatbish
Seriously. Was anyone able to read the paper? I want to read the paper!!
It’s an idea that every college student with a gravity bong and The Matrix on DVD has thought of before, but Rich is a well-regarded scientist, the director of the Center for Evolutionary Computation and Automated Design at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and is currently writing an as-yet-untitled book about the subject, so we’re going to go ahead and take him seriously.
originally posted by: Bassago
a reply to: robbystarbuck
This is pretty cool OP. So basically we' may be stuck in a holographic simulation that appears to be a combined version of Sim-City, Sim-Earth, Civilization, Call of Duty and Grand Theft Auto. Makes sense to me.
Guess that's why I've always felt like Moriarty stuck in Data's holodeck version of Sherlock Holmes. Get me out of this place please!
originally posted by: weirdguy
I think people need to come up with wacky idea's so their department receives funding grants. I wonder if this "matrix" theory existed before the movie came about. I'm pretty open minded but this is to weird even for me.
originally posted by: jonnywhite
I've never understood how we could possibly know whether reality is real or "simulated". Even if we found out there're a limited number of discrete points in our universe, so what? If there're no discrete points, so what? I don't see the "point".
I realize they're trying to say if there're infinite points then it's not computable because you'd need a computer with infinite size. My problem with that's how do we know if our instruments aren't sensitive enough? Surely the creators of our simulation can determine which tools we have access to and which values they'll create, and thus have complete control over our conclusions.
originally posted by: weirdguy
originally posted by: Iamthatbish
Seriously. Was anyone able to read the paper? I want to read the paper!!
The scientist nasa guy is releasing a book about it, so not a scientific journal but a book trying to explain his theory about a programmer from the future?
It’s an idea that every college student with a gravity bong and The Matrix on DVD has thought of before, but Rich is a well-regarded scientist, the director of the Center for Evolutionary Computation and Automated Design at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and is currently writing an as-yet-untitled book about the subject, so we’re going to go ahead and take him seriously.
www.vice.com...
oh, this paper
www.scribd.com...