It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xeven
Not California. Watch Seattle! It's comming!
originally posted by: Jennyfrenzy
a reply to: TinfoilTP
There's a difference between a prediction and hoping it happens. Who said they hope it happens?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
If they don't want it to happen why make doom porn threads?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Jennyfrenzy
a reply to: TinfoilTP
There's a difference between a prediction and hoping it happens. Who said they hope it happens?
I don't see any difference.
Once someone makes a public prediction they naturally hope for it to pan out or they get public egg all over their face.
If they don't want it to happen why make doom porn threads?
The various faults "talk" to each other, said Roland Burgmann, an earth scientist at UC Berkeley "The communicating family of faults sometimes tend to rupture together as a group or shut each other off."
The 1906 earthquake was likely a fluke, the perfect alignment of conditions that allowed 300 miles
The scientists based their prediction on the historical record, which shows a cluster of quakes shook the Bay Area from 1690 to 1776. At least six earthquakes, ranging from 6.3 to 7.7 magnitude, rattled the region's major faults during that period, Schwartz said.
Although the scientists predict a group of tremors, rather than just a single, large earthquake, they admit the future could surprise them. The Bay Area has a 63 percent chance of one or more large earthquakes before 2036, according to estimates released in 2008 by the Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities, a coalition of state, federal and academic geologists.