It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


U.S. considers attacking Islamic State militants in Syria

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 24 2014 @ 09:00 AM
White supremacy with no boundaries or laws that apply to you or just forgot that its illegal to go into a foreign nation with your military?

posted on Aug, 24 2014 @ 09:56 AM
Another «Efing» reason to re-occupy the Iraq.. right..? they asked you to leave in price of begging you to come back.

God help the humanity against this new wave of barbarism created by the CIA/Mossad and MI6.

posted on Aug, 24 2014 @ 10:38 AM

STORY: US 'set to launch air strikes' on senior Isis leaders in Syria

"White House will 'take action' against threats as Turkey comes under pressure to halt flow of jihadists across its border"

all I read is that ISIS leadership will be the few & far between targets of Drones & assets like the Dam near Mosul will be airstriked against the Jihadists...
just selectively culling Sunni Jihadists... while the Turks & MB Muslim Brotherhood secretly plot to create a Ottoman Caliphate rebirth that will replace the Barbaric ISIS model



STORY; U.S. about to Formally Align with Bashar al-Assad against ISIS and Politicians just can’t admit they were WRONG By Ben Barrack on August 22, 2014 in Featured, General

The US has already covertly assisted the Assad government by passing on intelligence about the exact location of jihadi leaders through the BND, the German intelligence service, a source has told The Independent. This may explain why Syrian aircraft and artillery have been able on occasion to target accurately rebel commanders and headquarters.

As this alliance grows, western countries will increasingly to be forced to admit they were wrong about something much, much bigger – their partnership with Turkey. The Turkish Prime Minister appears to be dealing with his southern border in much the same way that Barack Obama is dealing with the U.S. southern border – by leaving it wide open:

A complete volte face by the US, Britain and their allies in their relations with the Assad government is unlikely because it would mean admitting that past support for the Sunni rebellion had contributed to the growth of the caliphate.

Mr Freeman says that he doubted that “the liberal interventionists and neoconservatives who had pursued regime change in Syria were capable of reversing course. To do so would require them to admit that they bore considerable responsibility for legitimising pointless violence that has resulted in the deaths of 190,000 Syrians

the WH with its waffling on ISIS, Turkey, 6 MB officials working on making US policy...sure has put the Øbama shoes in concrete...

"Obama is Blowing Dog Whistle to the Caliphate Crowd"

a must read & look article

...After making an incredibly interesting observation that Barack Obama prefers to identify the group in Iraq and Syria as “ISIL” instead of “ISIS”, Fiscal Times author Liz Peek proceeded to bungle the explanation for why. She wasn’t entirely wrong but avoided the truth because it is apparently so hard for people – including her – to admit.

What Peek misses is that by referring to “ISIL”, Obama is giving legitimacy to a much larger movement that seeks a Caliphate; it’s simply one step shy of giving the Muslim Brotherhood and Ottoman Empire revivalists legitimacy. The question Peek did not seek an answer to was: Why is Obama giving legitimacy to a group that would serve as an Ottoman precursor?...

a lot of info , look at the MB 6 that the WH employs, they are sworn enemies of the State ---well before Øbama got installed to power

posted on Aug, 24 2014 @ 11:05 AM
Why aren't anybody else putting boots on the ground?? Is no one else helping with this?

This door to Syria, then Iran, can be a dangerous thing. I think the US should ask China and Russia to handle it.

new topics

top topics
<< 1   >>

log in