It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: sheepslayer247
Sounds "Authoritatively" cozy.
How would you handle the "Individualists" ?
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: sheepslayer247
Sounds "Authoritatively" cozy.
How would you handle the "Individualists" ?
I don't see why an individualist could not thrive in the sort of government I describe.
Or perhaps you expected me to say that we will drag them in to the town square and have them killed by having the Shriners run over them multiple times with their little, yet deadly, parade cars? That's what a commie would do, right?
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Oh. Now you want fair?
Gimme your money, make it "fair". (I jest)
Fairness is arbitrary. Fairness is usually brought up when someone has more than another and it isn't "fair".
originally posted by: grainofsand
I am self-employed due to capitalism. I am pleased about that, and the same opportunities are available for my fellow citizens in the UK if they have the motivation.
Which system would you prefer OP? Communism?!
Norway is also full of entrepreneurs like Wiggo Dalmo. Rates of start-up creation here are among the highest in the developed world, and Norway has more entrepreneurs per capita than the United States, according to the latest report by the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, a Boston-based research consortium. A 2010 study released by the U.S. Small Business Administration reported a similar result: Although America remains near the top of the world in terms of entrepreneurial aspirations -- that is, the percentage of people who want to start new things—in terms of actual start-up activity, our country has fallen behind not just Norway but also Canada, Denmark, and Switzerland.
Welcome to Norway, where business is radically transparent, militantly egalitarian, and, of course, heavily taxed. This is socialism, the sort of thing your average American CEO has nightmares about. But not Dalmo—and not most Norwegians. "The capitalist system functions well," Dalmo says. "But I'm a socialist in my bones."
But there is precious little evidence to suggest that our low taxes have done much for entrepreneurs—or even for the economy as a whole. "It's actually quite hard to say how tax policy affects the economy," says Joel Slemrod, a University of Michigan professor who served on the Council of Economic Advisers under Ronald Reagan. Slemrod says there is no statistical evidence to prove that low taxes result in economic prosperity. Some of the most prosperous countries—for instance, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, and, yes, Norway—also have some of the highest taxes. Norway, which in 2009 had the world's highest per-capita income, avoided the brunt of the financial crisis: From 2006 to 2009, its economy grew nearly 3 percent. The American economy grew less than one-tenth of a percent during the same period. Meanwhile, countries with some of the lowest taxes in Europe, like Ireland, Iceland, and Estonia, have suffered profoundly. The first two nearly went bankrupt; Estonia, the darling of antitax groups like the Cato Institute, currently has an unemployment rate of 16 percent. Its economy shrank 14 percent in 2009.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: MALBOSIA
I'm going to paraphrase Winston Churchill.
Capitalism is the worst style of economics, until you compare it to everything else.
I can't argue that, but...
If we are talking about creating a better system I think we could shape it better through communism or socialism than capitalism. Too many individual interests at stake in capitalism and your right the American constitution would never allow it.
Communism and socialism ignore or inhibit individuality. I like individuality. I am a cantankerous old fart. I like it that way.
what should we do Beezer? Im not challenging you but if you could imagine something better, what would it be?
Honest answer? Dunno. I'd have to give that some thought.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: sheepslayer247
How much is it going to cost me? (beezzer pulls out his check book)
This glorious people's republic of. . . what?
How will you pay for all this "free" stuff?
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: sheepslayer247
Communism falls into the same trap as other ideologies that are intrinsically linked to heterodox economic theory that does not accurately model human behavior. The people who fought for communism in the early part of the 20th century didn't do so because they wanted to live in a society oppressed by a totalitarian state. Their intentions were good and unfortunately they were wrong.
originally posted by: sheepslayer247
a reply to: beezzer
Good questions.
This glorious people's republic of. . . what?
I would prefer it to be called The Almighty Dictatorship of Sheepslayer!
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: sheepslayer247
When you remove profit, set artificial standards, take away the ability to earn on your own, you end up with housing projects.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
Say the country is a village of 10 people. They need money to trade. A bank opens and lends everyone 100 dollars to get started but they want 5% return on the loan. So $1000 dollars is in the economy split between 10 people. Problem is the bank wants $1050 back from all the borrowers in total. There is only $1000 in the economy.... so someone is going to default on their loan and now they either work for the bank or give up assets.
One such story is that of the origins of the most popular board game in modern history. It's an American classic: each new generation of Monopoly players learns to love (harmlessly) indulging its cutthroat, ruthless, greedy impulses. Players begin the game as equals. Luck — and a bit of strategy — eventually enables one player to dominate all others. That player ends up amassing a huge fortune in cash and real estate.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Show me an actual system where government has taken care of food, shelter, healthcare and has succeeded.
Show me a system that will work for the large and varied population of the US.
Show me a system that can provide all of that and still maintain within the framework of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: MALBOSIA
So you enjoy the benefits of a high-paying career in a capitalist society but whinge about the system that provides the fremework for your chilled life?
Sorry, but I just don't get that.