It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BGTM90
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: BGTM90
Sorry never meant to ruffle your feathers, I just dont find any comfort in your numbers, and that i find fukushima as the greater threat, unless chernobyl makes it to the water table that is...
Then you can kiss Russia and Europe goodbye...
I made this post to put some hard numbers and calculations into a topic that has been blamed for everything from killing all life in the Pacific to causing peoples tap water to be warmer. I thought maybe if I posted some numbers we could have a meaningful conversation.
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: 5StarOracle
It's Wiki so don't know how much it can be trusted, but a small comparison of the two incidents.
CLICK ME
originally posted by: Psynic
Fukushima IS killing the Pacific ocean and with NO WAY TO STOP IT, will eventually kill all marine life in it.
originally posted by: BGTM90
Here are the figures for Iodine-131 (131I). Now 131I only has a half-life of 8 days so its all gone from both accidents...
[...]
www.world-nuclear-news.org...
originally posted by: BGTM90
Yeah I didn't even look at wiki because its not really looked at as a reliable source, but all the figures on there seem to be sourced so Ill look at them later today and do the math and post them and we can compare the numbers. Also sense certain people don't seem to like the sources I posted I was thinking instead getting the figures from sources on the internet I would figure out the core innovatory of the reactors at meltdown and do figures based on different percentages released than no one can say that my sources are bias.
Here is a crowd sourced effort to monitor seawater on the west coast, using highly sensitive sample tests. Not some guy on a beach with a Geiger counter.
Can you post any figures, test, surveys?