It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
And while I have the time and opportunity....
I am very disappointed that I haven't gotten any feedback about how it makes more sense that the Daiichi nuclear plant workers fled before the tsunami and not after it, and how this would support the premises of the Finnish guy in the Youtube video.
P.M.
The earthquake took place at 14:46 JST (GMT 6:46) around 67 km (42 mi) from the nearest point on Japan's coastline, and initial estimates indicated the tsunami would have taken 10 to 30 minutes to reach the areas first affected...
originally posted by: ChaosComplex
originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
And while I have the time and opportunity....
I am very disappointed that I haven't gotten any feedback about how it makes more sense that the Daiichi nuclear plant workers fled before the tsunami and not after it, and how this would support the premises of the Finnish guy in the Youtube video.
P.M.
How long do you think the period between an earthquake and a resulting tsunami is? The tsunami in question wasn't some random occurrence, it was preceded by a significant earthquake, and there was a tsunami warning issued.
2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami
The earthquake took place at 14:46 JST (GMT 6:46) around 67 km (42 mi) from the nearest point on Japan's coastline, and initial estimates indicated the tsunami would have taken 10 to 30 minutes to reach the areas first affected...
I don't know about you, but 10 minutes is plenty of time for me to get my ass out to my car and start driving.
originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
originally posted by: ChaosComplex
originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
And while I have the time and opportunity....
I am very disappointed that I haven't gotten any feedback about how it makes more sense that the Daiichi nuclear plant workers fled before the tsunami and not after it, and how this would support the premises of the Finnish guy in the Youtube video.
P.M.
How long do you think the period between an earthquake and a resulting tsunami is? The tsunami in question wasn't some random occurrence, it was preceded by a significant earthquake, and there was a tsunami warning issued.
2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami
The earthquake took place at 14:46 JST (GMT 6:46) around 67 km (42 mi) from the nearest point on Japan's coastline, and initial estimates indicated the tsunami would have taken 10 to 30 minutes to reach the areas first affected...
I don't know about you, but 10 minutes is plenty of time for me to get my ass out to my car and start driving.
I sorry guy, but you did not read my earlier reply-post in which I was more specific on the timing of things by speculating about an evacuation that may have taken place BEFORE BOTH the earthquake and tsunami. I am also sorry if my omission in the reply-post at hand confused any issues.
P.M.
originally posted by: BGTM90
originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
originally posted by: ChaosComplex
originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
And while I have the time and opportunity....
I am very disappointed that I haven't gotten any feedback about how it makes more sense that the Daiichi nuclear plant workers fled before the tsunami and not after it, and how this would support the premises of the Finnish guy in the Youtube video.
P.M.
How long do you think the period between an earthquake and a resulting tsunami is? The tsunami in question wasn't some random occurrence, it was preceded by a significant earthquake, and there was a tsunami warning issued.
2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami
The earthquake took place at 14:46 JST (GMT 6:46) around 67 km (42 mi) from the nearest point on Japan's coastline, and initial estimates indicated the tsunami would have taken 10 to 30 minutes to reach the areas first affected...
I don't know about you, but 10 minutes is plenty of time for me to get my ass out to my car and start driving.
I sorry guy, but you did not read my earlier reply-post in which I was more specific on the timing of things by speculating about an evacuation that may have taken place BEFORE BOTH the earthquake and tsunami. I am also sorry if my omission in the reply-post at hand confused any issues.
P.M.
Can you provide proof that the facility was evacuated before the earthquake?
originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
Do you know why proof of speculation is inadmissible in a court of law?
ANSWER: Because it is an oxymoron.
P.M.
The most important prerequisites to be a witness are memory and perception. To be a witness, a person must have perceived the matter in question, and they must remember it. If they do not remember, or did not perceive, the matter, then their testimony is speculation and it is inadmissible.
originally posted by: BGTM90
originally posted by: theworldisnotenough
Do you know why proof of speculation is inadmissible in a court of law?
ANSWER: Because it is an oxymoron.
P.M.
That was my point. So all you have is speculation.
But to wrap it up: I feel that the message of the Finnish guy in the Youtube video cited in the original post together with speculation that the Daiichi plant workers evacuated before the earthquake and tsunami made much more sense than the speculative theories from other sources IMHO.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
yeah. and that guy ignited a huge bowl of weed before he said that too.