It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As an inquiry into the complex subject of international terrorism, the 9/11 Commission's 10th anniversary reprise is a slipshod farrago of circular argumentation, faulty reasoning and naïve gullibility about the claims of senior officials - but it does serve official Washington's purpose.One of the many things I learned in government is that the investigative commissions which inquire into a scandal, disaster or atrocity are usually intended to bury the real causes of the incident and trumpet other circumstantial or irrelevant details as if they are shocking or novel.
The "senior officials" were the actual perpetrators of 911, not the 19 Arab patsies.
. . . just like the original report it sings the phrases of senior officials . . .
give me something solid that does not start with David Ray, Steven, Theirrey or A/E911 Mistruth.....
I live where at least three of the alleged 19 Arab hijackers lived, including Mohamed Atta, in southwest Florida.
And you base this declaration on what actual evidence?
is about the 9/11 Commission. NOT just the NIST reports.
For there to be ANY definitive reports, the buildings would have to have been loaded with data collection devices.
I see you like to use big words.
Then you slip off the tracks about your history of investigations being void. Nice try. Completely wrong, but, nice try.
listening to engineers when they say that their results are going to be educated guesses.
The " Mohammed Atta" who my friend knew was the one who the Media presented.
There is a reason why Czech Intelligence still insists Mohammed Atta met with Iraqi officials in Prague, when the FBI and CIA swears he was still in the States. Think about it.
Care to suggest how she could be wrong in identifying Atta, when she had FBI agents coming to her bank and interviewing her on the transactions being made by him, with her serving as the teller?
Or, your friend is wrong. No...that cannot be.....
If you would present something actually resembling facts,
Using "truther" physics, isn't presenting facts.
The significance of FREEFALL is NONE of the gravitational energy was available to destroy the supporting structures, ALL converted to MOTION!
If there was a "double", then it would be an unknown person.
She is recalling the wrong day. Maybe her "Atta" was a double. Could be several things.