It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: PleiaDsClusterDck
what come back on your other troll account, shouldn't have join on the same date and used two wired name and troll in the same fashion. also you shouldn't have quoted your self with those obvious indicators.
but since you did, i'm pretty sure that their rockets have some high explosive in the and that they also place projectile in the caseing.
see here a description of what can be done with a dry ice bomb.
Dangers
Dry ice bombs have some serious risks:
Premature explosion. Burst pressure can occur within seconds, injuring the handler.
Dry ice is very cold: −78.5 °C (−109.3 °F). The explosion can carry shards of dry ice that had not sublimed.
The shock wave can be extremely loud and hearing damage can occur even at substantial distances.
The blast can propel fragments of the container at very high speeds causing cuts and puncture wounds.
Added shrapnel such as nails, marbles, and metal fragments can cause blunt force trauma to the body.
Dud bombs which fail to explode are a major safety problem. They cannot be left, yet cannot be safely approached. Unexploded bombs can be shot or otherwise ruptured from a safe distance. Injuries are common, with glass bottles in particular posing a risk of serious injury or death.[2][3][4][5]
Dry ice bomb
originally posted by: tovenar
We have reached a stage in the decline of the West in which we cannot admit that some of our opponents are uncivilized.
Hamas has no concept of the Law of Land Warfare---the Geneva Conventions. They routinely commit crimes against their own civilian populace, crimes a civilized ruler would fear to impose on his own subjects for purely humane reasons.
Putin has embarked on a course of annexing parts of neighboring states. Not occupying as part of a UN directive, not sending in troops to enforce a cease-fire, but simply taking land and calling it Russia. There is simply no way to do that in South Ossetia or Crimea and call it conforming international law.
Iran and most Islamist states not only perform routine executions in their legal system, their whole legal process is impromptu without any standards of what could be called "due process." Jurists routinely decide which rights of the accused will be honored--or not. Political arrestees are frequently held for decades before being found innocent.
But our liberal elites cannot even admit that our rivals our uncivilized. We keep pretending that they are; that they share our values, and basically play by the rules.
They don't and it is costing us to be dishonest with ourselves.
originally posted by: gladtobehere
a reply to: hounddoghowlie
There is some kind of incredible disconnect or lopsidedness about these so called "rockets".
Now the Israelis are claiming that the "rockets" arent doing any damage because of "Iron Dome" when the fact is that the "rockets" weren't doing any damage BEFORE "Iron Dome".
To the average person, it clearly appears as though the "threat" from these "rockets" is being grossly exaggerated by a government, Israel, with a well established history of propaganda and lies.
originally posted by: damwel
I sure any rocket will damage something but I don't see how you can blame someone for defending their land from being stolen. The Israeli are anything but innocent in this matter. They keep taking more and more Palestinian land and they are surprised that they get attacked? Go back to the original 1947 borders and give back what you stole.
originally posted by: conz1992
a reply to: damwel
I've thought this up until I was told the land was given lawfully by the UN, but seemingly the party in power refused a 2 state country, and have done ever since? I haven't exactly read into it a lot, but I know this agreement was in 1942
originally posted by: Humanity4Ever
a reply to: damwel
How can land be stolen if it never belonged to them in the first place?
The Palestinians should have accepted the UN Partition Plan in 1947 instead of declaring war on Israel, and they would have had their own state.
if anyone should be catching flack about what is happening over in gaza. it's the ones who made the promises.
I can't help but agree with this statement.
Maybe the injured parties should be sending the British government a bill for all they have had to put up with.edit on 29-7-2014 by teamcommander because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: teamcommander
a reply to: hounddoghowlie
if anyone should be catching flack about what is happening over in gaza. it's the ones who made the promises.
I can't help but agree with this statement.
Maybe the injured parties should be sending the British government a bill for all they have had to put up with.
Massacre of Jerusalem
Jews fought side-by-side with Muslim soldiers to defend Jerusalem against the Crusaders.[4] Saint Louis University Professor Thomas Madden, author of A Concise History of the Crusades, claims the "Jewish Defenders" of the city knew the rules of warfare and retreated to their synagogue to "prepare for death" since the Crusaders had breached the outer walls.[5] According to the Muslim chronicle of Ibn al-Qalanisi, "The Jews assembled in their synagogue, and the Franks burned it over their heads."[6] One modern-day source even claims the Crusaders "[circled] the screaming, flame-tortured humanity singing 'Christ We Adore Thee!' with their Crusader crosses held high."[7] However, a contemporary Jewish communication does not corroborate the report that Jews were actually inside of the Synagogue when it was set fire.[8] This letter was discovered among the Cairo Geniza collection in 1975 by historian Shelomo Dov Goitein.[9] Historians believe that it was written just two weeks after the siege, making it "the earliest account on the conquest in any language."[9] However, all sources agree that a synagogue was indeed burned during the siege.
History of the Jews and the Crusades