It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: HiAliens
Solar dehydration.
Atmospheric Water Generators
originally posted by: subtopia
Great thread, there are places in Australia now where they are turning street sidewalks from grass areas to vegetable gardens where anyone can take what is growing, no one wrecks it, or takes too much...
Change can at times be frustratingly slow yet once it begins to take hold, it often occurs very fast, the masses are beginning to see the need for more change.
Sometimes the message needs to be given again and again, well done...
You are trying to incite us to brainstorm into finding a better future by promising us a future full of money. But this insults me. I don't change the world because I like money, I change it because I don't like the way it is, period.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: HiAliens
And who is going to give us money as we help other people? You or John Rockefeller?
It's an insult to treat the Earth as a marketing device.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: HiAliens
And who is going to give us money as we help other people? You or John Rockefeller?
It's an insult to treat the Earth as a marketing device.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: subtopia
Of course we pay with money. What I mean to ask, is who will give us the money to pay solar panels in the first place? I'm poor, and I certainly can't buy any substantial solar panels; I have barely enough money to eat. This means that those who will be capable of affording world-changing tech will be once again the elite. And only the elite will have enough dough so to lend money to the poor, enough money to employ the poor as a labour force. It's repeating the same market problem we have now all over again.
But additionally, I see a big opportunity here for politics to step in and control this so-called new "market".
originally posted by: HiAliens
Over a decade or two, that crowdfunding could take center stage in our economy
originally posted by: NthOther
Has anyone stopped to consider that maybe less technology is the way to go? I mean, every time we're promised a technological utopia due to some new invention(s), our lives become even more complicated, we end up working more hours, we are more socially isolated, we are less independent, and our ecosystems end up being further damaged.
We should be asking ourselves... Is this truly an enlightened path?
Go ahead, throw the rotten tomatoes.
originally posted by: HiAliens
What's your alternative plan?