It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Restricted
I see it as an edict to stifle individual opinion. ATS wants its members to practice strict political correctness.
Not everyone has the same opinion nor should ATS expect them to.
originally posted by: Restricted
I see it as an edict to stifle individual opinion. ATS wants its members to practice strict political correctness.
Not everyone has the same opinion nor should ATS expect them to.
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
For the record I am not accusing anyone of being a shill here, or suggesting anyone keep their opinions to themselves.
originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
I can't help but think of that song from Good Burger, "We're All Dudes".
The chorus,
I'm a dude
he's a dude
she's a dude
we're all dudes, hey
Replace dude with shill!
For the record I am not accusing anyone of being a shill here, or suggesting anyone keep their opinions to themselves. I just thought a "paranoid" version of the song sounded silly in my head.
originally posted by: beezzer
originally posted by: Restricted
I see it as an edict to stifle individual opinion. ATS wants its members to practice strict political correctness.
Not everyone has the same opinion nor should ATS expect them to.
I haven't found T&C nor political correctness stifling my opinion.
Maybe it's just me.
originally posted by: Restricted
We aren't allowed to call a spade a spade. I know damn well what decorum means.
originally posted by: Restricted
I see it as an edict to stifle individual opinion. ATS wants its members to practice strict political correctness.
Not everyone has the same opinion nor should ATS expect them to.
Ad hominem (Latin) means “against the man”. As the name suggests, it is a literary term that involves commenting on or against an opponent to undermine him instead of his arguments.
...
Arguers who are not familiar with the principles of making logical arguments commonly end up saying something that would draw the audience’s attention to the distasteful characteristics of the individual. Such people use this fallacy as a tool to deceive their audience. Making such a blatant personal comment against somebody makes it hard for people to believe it isn’t true. Typically, even the arguer himself believes that such personal traits or circumstances are not enough to dispose of an individual’s opinion or argument. However, if looked at rationally, such arguments even if true never provide a valid reason to disregard someone’s criticism.