It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: fatdeeman
Let's assume the Russians did track something else close to M17, would they be able to tell the difference between a su 25 and the nose section of the plane falling? Would they have similar radar cross sections? Could the nose falling appear similar to a plane that's decreasing altitude?
My initial feeling is that you couldn't confuse one with the other but then again if the nose followed a relatively straight path and just decreased altitude as it fell I suppose it could me mistaken for a small aircraft maneuvering.
The New indentification mark that showed up indicated that it was a SU-25 because, and they argued that it didnt have a secondary indentification mark installes whch was typical for a military Aircraft
originally posted by: roadgravel
if a US Ticonderoga-class Aegis guided missile cruiser could not know the difference between an airbus and an F-14 then has radar improved, and that Russian radar, to be able to know what an SU-25 return is.
edit:
The New indentification mark that showed up indicated that it was a SU-25 because, and they argued that it didnt have a secondary indentification mark installes whch was typical for a military Aircraft
So it must be an SU-25. Somewhat of a stretch.
originally posted by: roadgravel
if a US Ticonderoga-class Aegis guided missile cruiser could not know the difference between an airbus and an F-14 then has radar improved, and that Russian radar, to be able to know what an SU-25 return is.
edit:
The New indentification mark that showed up indicated that it was a SU-25 because, and they argued that it didnt have a secondary indentification mark installes whch was typical for a military Aircraft
So it must be an SU-25. Somewhat of a stretch.
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: spy66
Id go with him over the Russian general. See his radar contact flew behind the 777 than went to the crash sight and hivered. So i guess he figures Ukraime has harriers. I dont think truthfully he believed it either he was made to say it by kremlin.
See his radar contact flew behind the 777 than went to the crash sight and hivered. So i guess he figures Ukraime has harriers
originally posted by: Flatcoat
a reply to: dragonridr
See his radar contact flew behind the 777 than went to the crash sight and hivered. So i guess he figures Ukraime has harriers
I gather you mean hovered. I think that was most likely a bad translation, he probably meant "remained in the vicinity".
I gather you mean hovered. I think that was most likely a bad translation, he probably meant "remained in the vicinity".
originally posted by: GargIndia
Russia has every right to take any actions to ensure security of its nation. I completely support Russian actions against Ukraine.
You don't trust me, do you? I don't blame you. If there is to be a brave new world, our generation is going to have the hardest time living in it.
Chancellor Gorkon: